Default string

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 67%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics107% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive301% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemDefault string  (all builds)
MotherboardDefault Default string
Memory11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200320
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMay 04 '23 at 21:17
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10510U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
72.8% Very good
Memory 80.8
1-Core 126
2-Core 230
82% 146 Pts
4-Core 356
8-Core 468
52% 412 Pts
64-Core 448
28% 448 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 72.8%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6600-XT-$334
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 23.4.3
Performing below potential (63rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
107% Outstanding
Lighting 113
Reflection 137
Parallax 226
92% 159 fps
MRender 215
Gravity 121
Splatting 182
141% 173 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 107%
Great: 110%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$93
320GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1351 1362 1355 1361 1345 1336 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
301% Outstanding
Read 2,463
Write 2,230
Mixed 1,859
SusWrite 1,352
443% 1,976 MB/s
4K Read 60.6
4K Write 144
4K Mixed 81.2
272% 95.3 MB/s
DQ Read 930
DQ Write 644
DQ Mixed 815
601% 796 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 301%
Great: 410%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4SFRA266.C8FD1 07FB GSA8G4SCL196P-26 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
80.5% Excellent
MC Read 31.6
MC Write 32.1
MC Mixed 23.6
83% 29.1 GB/s
SC Read 17.4
SC Write 30.2
SC Mixed 22.3
67% 23.3 GB/s
Latency 79
51% 79 ns
Poor: 80%
This bench: 80.5%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical string Builds (Compare 14,755 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Default string

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback