HP ZBook Power 15.6 inch G9 Mobile Workstation PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics13% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive160% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP ZBook Power 15.6 inch G9 Mobile Workstation PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 89C0
Memory14.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221230
Uptime8.1 Days
Run DateMay 04 '23 at 14:14
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-12700H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
72.7% Very good
Memory 67.5
1-Core 134
2-Core 247
81% 150 Pts
4-Core 419
8-Core 619
65% 519 Pts
64-Core 1,018
63% 1,018 Pts
Poor: 91%
This bench: 72.7%
Great: 102%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
HP(103C 89C0) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4091
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
13% Very poor
Lighting 15.1
Reflection 45.8
Parallax 17.4
12% 26.1 fps
MRender 16.5
Gravity 22.9
Splatting 14.3
14% 17.9 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 13%
Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL2512HCJQ-00BH1 512GB
327GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS3NGXH
SusWrite @10s intervals: 774 826 718 810 852 886 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
160% Outstanding
Read 1097
Write 934
Mixed 1,108
SusWrite 811
222% 988 MB/s
4K Read 47.7
4K Write 64.9
4K Mixed 53.9
176% 55.5 MB/s
DQ Read 310
DQ Write 218
DQ Mixed 272
201% 267 MB/s
Poor: 126%
This bench: 160%
Great: 400%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMCG78AEBSA095N HMCG78MEBSA092N 32GB
4800, 4800 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
109% Outstanding
MC Read 53.9
MC Write 23.3
MC Mixed 49.2
120% 42.1 GB/s
SC Read 14.2
SC Write 34.2
SC Mixed 23.7
69% 24 GB/s
Latency 107
37% 107 ns
Poor: 109%
This bench: 109%
Great: 157%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ZBook Power 15.6 inch G9 Mobile Workstation PC Builds (Compare 609 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

System: HP ZBook Power 15.6 inch G9 Mobile Workstation PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback