Acer One 14 Z1-471

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 15%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (9th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 91 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 9.83%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics0.84% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive31.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (67%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer One 14 Z1-471  (all builds)
MotherboardSR Acer One 14 Z1-471
Memory1.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180816
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 04 '23 at 06:50
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 67%

 PC Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-9220 APU (2016 M.SR)
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
9.83% Terrible
Memory 11.5
1-Core 33.6
2-Core 43.8
16% 29.6 Pts
4-Core 44.1
8-Core 66.6
7% 55.3 Pts
64-Core 60.6
4% 60.6 Pts
Poor: 11%
This bench: 9.83%
Great: 39%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R4 Graphics
Device(1297 2084) 128MB
Ram: 128MB, Driver: 19.10.22
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
0.84% Terrible
Lighting 0.9
Reflection 1.7
Parallax 1.4
1% 1.33 fps
MRender 1.4
Gravity 0.5
Splatting 1.8
1% 1.23 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 0.84%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 240GB-$27
198GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR052
SusWrite @10s intervals: 236 118 85 287 94 96 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
31.3% Below average
Read 365
Write 252
Mixed 57.8
SusWrite 153
46% 207 MB/s
4K Read 7.4
4K Write 7.7
4K Mixed 6.7
24% 7.27 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 31.3%
Great: 92%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown D44G8G6H4SRTAFRK49 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
12.2% Very poor
MC Read 4.2
MC Write 4.8
MC Mixed 4.2
13% 4.4 GB/s
SC Read 2.8
SC Write 3.4
SC Mixed 3.4
9% 3.2 GB/s
Latency 390
10% 390 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 12.2%
Great: 22%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical One 14 Z1-471 Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Acer One 14 Z1-471

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback