Asus ROG STRIX B350-F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 96%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics95.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive245% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX B350-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory21.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220428
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateMay 02 '23 at 09:45
Run Duration175 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X-$180
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
97.1% Outstanding
Memory 77.3
1-Core 175
2-Core 346
105% 200 Pts
4-Core 626
8-Core 1,102
104% 864 Pts
64-Core 1,591
98% 1,591 Pts
Poor: 86%
This bench: 97.1%
Great: 112%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6600-$330
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 23.4.2
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
95.7% Outstanding
Lighting 95.4
Reflection 139
Parallax 185
78% 140 fps
MRender 213
Gravity 96.7
Splatting 169
130% 160 fps
Poor: 83%
This bench: 95.7%
Great: 91%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
KZ512 512GB
375GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V0530B5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1366 1444 1494 1584 1597 882 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
245% Outstanding
Read 1,555
Write 1623
Mixed 1,141
SusWrite 1,395
322% 1,429 MB/s
4K Read 47.3
4K Write 155
4K Mixed 39.9
205% 80.7 MB/s
DQ Read 780
DQ Write 879
DQ Mixed 569
501% 743 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 245%
Great: 244%
RX7 MSATA 256GB
109GB free
Firmware: U0324A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 395 402 407 420 425 423 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
87.9% Excellent
Read 474
Write 423
Mixed 313
SusWrite 412
91% 405 MB/s
4K Read 24.5
4K Write 95.4
4K Mixed 20.4
114% 46.8 MB/s
DQ Read 139
DQ Write 328
DQ Mixed 28.4
80% 165 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 87.9%
Great: 78%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$47
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 189 194 190 178 186 190 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 165
Write 153
Mixed 85
SusWrite 188
108% 148 MB/s
4K Read 2.9
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.1
143% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 101%
Great: 106%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$50
571GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 134 138 137 138 138 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
77% Very good
Read 132
Write 117
Mixed 85.6
SusWrite 136
87% 118 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
187% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 77%
Great: 84%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79
2TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 107 106 105 105 105 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
46.6% Average
Read 57.3
Write 106
Mixed 25.4
SusWrite 105
53% 73.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
38% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 46.6%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-2666 1x31GB
1 of 4 slots used
31GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
50.9% Above average
MC Read 18.6
MC Write 16.5
MC Mixed 16.1
49% 17.1 GB/s
SC Read 18.6
SC Write 19.4
SC Mixed 18.3
54% 18.8 GB/s
Latency 85.6
47% 85.6 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 50.9%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX B350-F GAMING Builds (Compare 3,869 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX B350-F GAMING - $120

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $470
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback