Lenovo 20QA000QUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics11.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive120% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 20QA000QUS  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20QA000QUS
Memory9.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.3 GHz
Display2256 x 1504 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210805
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 01 '23 at 15:00
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1180G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
53.4% Above average
Memory 34.7
1-Core 144
2-Core 244
72% 141 Pts
4-Core 395
8-Core 508
58% 451 Pts
64-Core 516
32% 516 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 53.4%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Legend(17AA 229D) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9510
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
11.7% Very poor
Lighting 13.2
Reflection 17.4
Parallax 17.8
11% 16.1 fps
MRender 14.5
Gravity 21.5
Splatting 13.9
13% 16.6 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 11.7%
Great: 17%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SKHynix_HFM512GD3HX015N 512GB
433GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 41040C20
SusWrite @10s intervals: 567 599 559 670 714 662 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
120% Outstanding
Read 880
Write 523
Mixed 695
SusWrite 628
153% 682 MB/s
4K Read 29
4K Write 42.1
4K Mixed 38.1
115% 36.4 MB/s
DQ Read 328
DQ Write 117
DQ Mixed 354
227% 266 MB/s
Poor: 103%
This bench: 120%
Great: 281%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung 8x2GB
8 of 8 slots used
16GB Row of chips LPDDR4 clocked @ 4267 MHz
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
57.1% Above average
MC Read 21.3
MC Write 27.7
MC Mixed 15
61% 21.3 GB/s
SC Read 12
SC Write 25.3
SC Mixed 11.6
47% 16.3 GB/s
Latency 229
18% 229 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 57.1%
Great: 154%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20QA000QUS Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

System: Lenovo 20QA000QUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback