Default string be filled by O.E.M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 65%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics124% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive171% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
13 months ago, 13 months ago.
MotherboardDefault string be filled by O.E.M  (all builds)
Memory60.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220506
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 30 '23 at 18:07
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1165G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
59.5% Above average
Memory 60.1
1-Core 89.8
2-Core 182
61% 111 Pts
4-Core 324
8-Core 423
48% 374 Pts
64-Core 440
27% 440 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 59.5%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340
Gigabyte(1458 4077) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 531.68
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
124% Outstanding
Lighting 173
Reflection 152
Parallax 153
141% 159 fps
MRender 173
Gravity 126
Splatting 109
108% 136 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 124%
Great: 136%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Fanxiang S500 1TB
316GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0918A0L
SusWrite @10s intervals: 783 174 751 1368 859 184 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
171% Outstanding
Read 1,363
Write 1291
Mixed 783
SusWrite 687
231% 1,031 MB/s
4K Read 36
4K Write 119
4K Mixed 18
141% 57.8 MB/s
DQ Read 846
DQ Write 725
DQ Mixed 534
469% 702 MB/s
Poor: 130%
This bench: 171%
Great: 226%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Vasekey 2x31.5GB
2 of 2 slots used
63GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
86% Excellent
MC Read 33.5
MC Write 37.6
MC Mixed 28.1
94% 33.1 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 28
SC Mixed 14.4
55% 19.3 GB/s
Latency 127
31% 127 ns
Poor: 84%
This bench: 86%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical string be filled by O.E.M Builds (Compare 137 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Default string be filled by O.E.M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback