Default string be filled by O.E.M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 59%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics96.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive128% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardDefault string be filled by O.E.M  (all builds)
Memory59.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220506
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 30 '23 at 17:37
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU 12%
Watch Gameplay: 2060S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1165G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
54.9% Above average
Memory 58.7
1-Core 91.2
2-Core 165
59% 105 Pts
4-Core 275
8-Core 419
43% 347 Pts
64-Core 419
26% 419 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 54.9%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super)-$510
Gigabyte(1458 4009) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 531.68
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
96.6% Outstanding
Lighting 116
Reflection 106
Parallax 124
94% 115 fps
MRender 168
Gravity 109
Splatting 104
101% 127 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 96.6%
Great: 106%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Fanxiang S500 1TB
316GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0918A0L
SusWrite @10s intervals: 530 232 193 229 184 232 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
128% Outstanding
Read 1,394
Write 1122
Mixed 280
SusWrite 267
169% 766 MB/s
4K Read 39.6
4K Write 75.5
4K Mixed 14.3
118% 43.1 MB/s
DQ Read 854
DQ Write 164
DQ Mixed 194
224% 404 MB/s
Poor: 130%
This bench: 128%
Great: 226%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Vasekey 2x31.5GB
2 of 2 slots used
63GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
86% Excellent
MC Read 33.3
MC Write 37.6
MC Mixed 28
94% 33 GB/s
SC Read 15.7
SC Write 28.6
SC Mixed 15.1
57% 19.8 GB/s
Latency 131
30% 131 ns
Poor: 84%
This bench: 86%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical string be filled by O.E.M Builds (Compare 137 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Default string be filled by O.E.M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback