Gigabyte GA-H110M-DS2V-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics8.55% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
13 months ago, 13 months ago.
SystemGigabyte H110M-DS2V
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H110M-DS2V-CF  (all builds)
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170609
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 30 '23 at 13:21
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU 33%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G4600-$27
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
46.6% Average
Memory 53.4
1-Core 95.4
2-Core 122
53% 90.1 Pts
4-Core 233
8-Core 219
30% 226 Pts
64-Core 226
14% 226 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 46.6%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-$112
Nvidia(10DE 0973) 1GB
CLim: 1110 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 474.30
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
8.55% Terrible
Lighting 9.5
Reflection 12.6
Parallax 12.2
8% 11.4 fps
MRender 14.2
Gravity 12.4
Splatting 11.1
10% 12.6 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.55%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Viva300s 120GB 120GB
10GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q0125BBT
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 444
Write 402
Mixed 366
90% 404 MB/s
4K Read 31.2
4K Write 55.2
4K Mixed 37.2
124% 41.2 MB/s
DQ Read 309
DQ Write 306
DQ Mixed 219
189% 278 MB/s
Poor: 52% Great: 113%
SP120GBSS3S57A25 120GB
91GB free
Firmware: V2.8
SusWrite @10s intervals: 273 308 306 339 347 348 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
65.1% Good
Read 438
Write 322
Mixed 291
SusWrite 320
77% 343 MB/s
4K Read 22.8
4K Write 52
4K Mixed 10.9
76% 28.6 MB/s
DQ Read 113
DQ Write 167
DQ Mixed 17.4
48% 99 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 65.1%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43BB1-CPB M378A1K43CB2-CRC 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
62.5% Good
MC Read 19.3
MC Write 27.1
MC Mixed 21.7
65% 22.7 GB/s
SC Read 16.1
SC Write 24.6
SC Mixed 18.2
56% 19.6 GB/s
Latency 149
27% 149 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 62.5%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H110M-DS2V-CF Builds (Compare 486 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H110M-DS2V-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $88
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback