Acer Aspire E5-773

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics4.48% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive61.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAcer Aspire E5-773  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire E5-773
Memory12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160902
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 29 '23 at 20:30
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 32%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6200U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
48.2% Average
Memory 65.4
1-Core 72.4
2-Core 108
50% 82 Pts
4-Core 180
8-Core 191
24% 185 Pts
64-Core 189
12% 189 Pts
Poor: 17%
This bench: 48.2%
Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)
Acer(1025 0983) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2115
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
4.48% Terrible
Lighting 4.9
Reflection 3.9
Parallax 5.9
4% 4.9 fps
MRender 6.4
Gravity 4.8
Splatting 8.1
5% 6.43 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.48%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SA400M8240G 240GB
61GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK62B3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 117 182 107 89 84 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
61.6% Good
Read 392
Write 120
Mixed 302
SusWrite 116
52% 232 MB/s
4K Read 24.2
4K Write 39.7
4K Mixed 25.2
90% 29.7 MB/s
DQ Read 250
DQ Write 249
DQ Mixed 100
116% 200 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 61.6%
Great: 91%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2004)-$46
774GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 99 103 104 105 105 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
59.2% Above average
Read 103
Write 102
Mixed 55.3
SusWrite 103
67% 90.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
149% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 59.2%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F3 DDR3 1600 C9 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
50.6% Above average
MC Read 18.4
MC Write 18.7
MC Mixed 17.1
52% 18.1 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 15.4
44% 15.3 GB/s
Latency 113
35% 113 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 50.6%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire E5-773 Builds (Compare 22 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire E5-773

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 20% - Very poor Total price: $94
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback