Acer Aspire E5-773

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics4.78% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive50% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAcer Aspire E5-773  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire E5-773
Memory12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160902
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 28 '23 at 14:15
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6200U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
47.1% Average
Memory 63.6
1-Core 72.9
2-Core 131
53% 89.2 Pts
4-Core 178
8-Core 184
24% 181 Pts
64-Core 184
11% 184 Pts
Poor: 17%
This bench: 47.1%
Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)
Acer(1025 0983) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2115
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
4.78% Terrible
Lighting 5
Reflection 3.8
Parallax 5.5
4% 4.77 fps
MRender 6.4
Gravity 6.9
Splatting 8.7
6% 7.33 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.78%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SA400M8240G 240GB
67GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK62B3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 255 182 11 109 118 130 MB/s
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
50% Average
Read 226
Write 101
Mixed 144
SusWrite 134
34% 151 MB/s
4K Read 20.8
4K Write 37.3
4K Mixed 22.1
80% 26.7 MB/s
DQ Read 146
DQ Write 223
DQ Mixed 51.1
76% 140 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 50%
Great: 91%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2004)-$46
774GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 103 103 102 106 104 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
58.9% Above average
Read 103
Write 90.9
Mixed 55.6
SusWrite 102
64% 87.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.7
139% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 58.9%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F3 DDR3 1600 C9 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
50.7% Above average
MC Read 18.2
MC Write 18.9
MC Mixed 17.1
52% 18.1 GB/s
SC Read 12.8
SC Write 18.4
SC Mixed 15.8
45% 15.7 GB/s
Latency 117
34% 117 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire E5-773 Builds (Compare 22 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire E5-773

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 20% - Very poor Total price: $94
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback