MSI X399 GAMING PRO CARBON AC (MS-7B09)

Performance Results


Gaming 170% UFO	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 168% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	246% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	168% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Run History

13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago.

System	Micro-Star MS-7B09
Motherboard	MSI X399 GAMING PRO CARBON AC (MS-7B09) (all builds)
Memory	55.4 GB free of 64 GB @ 3 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20181114
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 28 '23 at 23:37
Run Duration	125 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen TR 1900X-$110 7,071 User benchmarks, average bench 76% SP3r2, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	69.8% Good	Memory 67.2 1-Core 107 2-Core 217 71% 130 Pts	4-Core 389 8-Core 682 65% 536 Pts	64-Core 1,039 64% 1,039 Pts
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 69.8% Great: 87%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4090-$1,782 25,956 User benchmarks, average bench 370% MSI(1462 5103) CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 531.68 Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	246% Outstanding	Lighting 300 Reflection 364 Parallax 766 244% 477 fps	MRender 532 Gravity 530 Splatting 294 354% 452 fps
Poor: 303% ↑ This bench: 246% Great: 407%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$150 38,097 User benchmarks, average bench 241% 162GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1162 1159 1153 1131 797 581 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	168% Outstanding	Read 1195 Write 1,418 Mixed 906 SusWrite 997 254% 1,129 MB/s	4K Read 26.3 4K Write 46.1 4K Mixed 32.4 106% 34.9 MB/s	DQ Read 719 DQ Write 479 DQ Mixed 654 473% 617 MB/s
Poor: 157% ↑ This bench: 168% Great: 302%
Toshiba P300 3TB-$97 74,038 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 81GB free Firmware: MX6OACF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 154 155 160 148 158 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	87.8% Excellent	Read 151 Write 150 Mixed 40.3 SusWrite 155 90% 124 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.5 111% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 87.8% Great: 108%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown F4-3200C16-16GVK F4-3200C16-16GVK Kingston KF3200C16D4/16GX Kingston KF3200C16D4/16GX 64GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 143% 3000, 3000, 3000, 3000 MHz 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	141% Outstanding	MC Read 47.1 MC Write 67.5 MC Mixed 54.1 161% 56.2 GB/s	SC Read 16.5 SC Write 34.7 SC Mixed 23.2 71% 24.8 GB/s	Latency 108 37% 108 ns
Poor: 141% ↑ This bench: 141% Great: 145%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X399 GAMING PRO CARBON AC (MS-7B09) Builds (Compare 265 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 99%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 120%

UFO

Motherboard: MSI X399 GAMING PRO CARBON AC (MS-7B09)

CPU
Ryzen TR 1950XAMD $225Bench 77%, 23,641 samples	125x
Ryzen TR 1920XAMD $800Bench 78%, 10,440 samples	44x
Ryzen TR 1900XAMD $110Bench 76%, 7,071 samples	37x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	39x
RTX 2080Nvidia $270Bench 124%, 316,424 samples	19x
RTX 3070Nvidia $455Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	15x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	17x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $159Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	13x
960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $249Bench 279%, 18,356 samples	13x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x16GBCorsairBench 96%, 10,311 samples	12x
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	9x
TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 8x8GBUnknownBench 160%, 29 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 70% - Good

Total price: $753

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $124	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16