MSI X399 GAMING PRO CARBON AC (MS-7B09)

Performance Results


Gaming 161% UFO	Desktop 81% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 158% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	219% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	179% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Run History

13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago.

System	Micro-Star MS-7B09
Motherboard	MSI X399 GAMING PRO CARBON AC (MS-7B09) (all builds)
Memory	48.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 3 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20181114
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 28 '23 at 09:56
Run Duration	233 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen TR 1900X-$110 7,071 User benchmarks, average bench 76% SP3r2, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	73.9% Very good	Memory 70.6 1-Core 109 2-Core 205 72% 128 Pts	4-Core 415 8-Core 714 68% 565 Pts	64-Core 1085 67% 1085 Pts
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 73.9% Great: 87%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4090-$1,650 25,956 User benchmarks, average bench 370% MSI(1462 5103) CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 526.47 Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	219% Outstanding	Lighting 230 Reflection 413 Parallax 770 188% 471 fps	MRender 533 Gravity 575 Splatting 295 365% 468 fps
Poor: 303% ↑ This bench: 219% Great: 407%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$150 38,097 User benchmarks, average bench 241% 166GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1035 954 982 1038 1052 659 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	179% Outstanding	Read 1,494 Write 1,526 Mixed 739 SusWrite 954 264% 1,178 MB/s	4K Read 28.7 4K Write 47.6 4K Mixed 34.8 113% 37 MB/s	DQ Read 710 DQ Write 447 DQ Mixed 635 458% 597 MB/s
Poor: 157% ↑ This bench: 179% Great: 302%
Toshiba P300 3TB-$99 74,038 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 72GB free Firmware: MX6OACF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 158 161 161 160 159 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	90.4% Outstanding	Read 155 Write 164 Mixed 34.2 SusWrite 160 93% 128 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.8 177% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 90.4% Great: 108%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown F4-3200C16-16GVK F4-3200C16-16GVK Kingston KF3200C16D4/16GX Kingston KF3200C16D4/16GX 64GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 143% 3000, 3000, 3000, 3000 MHz 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	144% Outstanding	MC Read 48.3 MC Write 68.3 MC Mixed 53.8 162% 56.8 GB/s	SC Read 17.8 SC Write 37.9 SC Mixed 25.5 77% 27.1 GB/s	Latency 100 40% 100 ns
Poor: 141% ↑ This bench: 144% Great: 145%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X399 GAMING PRO CARBON AC (MS-7B09) Builds (Compare 266 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 99%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 120%

UFO

Motherboard: MSI X399 GAMING PRO CARBON AC (MS-7B09)

CPU
Ryzen TR 1950XAMD $225Bench 77%, 23,641 samples	125x
Ryzen TR 1920XAMD $800Bench 78%, 10,440 samples	45x
Ryzen TR 1900XAMD $110Bench 76%, 7,071 samples	37x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	39x
RTX 2080Nvidia $270Bench 124%, 316,424 samples	19x
RTX 3070Nvidia $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	15x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $84Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	17x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $159Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	13x
960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $249Bench 279%, 18,356 samples	13x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x16GBCorsairBench 96%, 10,311 samples	12x
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $129Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	9x
TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 8x8GBUnknownBench 160%, 29 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 67% - Good

Total price: $794

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16