Alienware M17xR4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics30.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive64.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAlienware M17xR4  (all builds)
MotherboardAlienware M17xR4
Memory12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920x1080x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180528
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 28 '23 at 20:32
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3740QM-$220
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
67.7% Good
Memory 85.2
1-Core 98.4
2-Core 180
71% 121 Pts
4-Core 272
8-Core 452
44% 362 Pts
64-Core 438
27% 438 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 67.7%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970M
Dell(1028 057B) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1038 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 353.82
Performing below potential (60th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
30.6% Below average
Lighting 37.5
Reflection 43.6
Parallax 37.5
31% 39.5 fps
MRender 39.8
Gravity 39
Splatting 34.8
31% 37.9 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 30.6%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 250GB-$251
126GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXT08B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 218 205 177 182 161 164 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
64.9% Good
Read 425
Write 209
Mixed 153
SusWrite 184
54% 243 MB/s
4K Read 21.1
4K Write 46.8
4K Mixed 19.7
82% 29.2 MB/s
DQ Read 343
DQ Write 190
DQ Mixed 57.1
98% 197 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 64.9%
Great: 85%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
152GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 389 292 291 292 291 292 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
92.5% Outstanding
Read 456
Write 420
Mixed 390
SusWrite 308
88% 393 MB/s
4K Read 29.6
4K Write 59.9
4K Mixed 38.2
126% 42.6 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 358
270% 363 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 92.5%
Great: 124%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown JAC1600S1108 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
51.7% Above average
MC Read 20.9
MC Write 19.5
MC Mixed 17.1
55% 19.2 GB/s
SC Read 5.4
SC Write 10.1
SC Mixed 11.9
26% 9.13 GB/s
Latency 71.8
56% 71.8 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 51.7%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M17xR4 Builds (Compare 672 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Alienware M17xR4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 46% - Average Total price: $520
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback