Alienware M17xR4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics30.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive74.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAlienware M17xR4  (all builds)
MotherboardAlienware M17xR4
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920x1080x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180528
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 28 '23 at 15:40
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU 27%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3740QM-$220
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
55.3% Above average
Memory 82.7
1-Core 98.9
2-Core 187
71% 123 Pts
4-Core 152
8-Core 415
32% 284 Pts
64-Core 232
14% 232 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 55.3%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970M
Dell(1028 057B) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1038 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 353.82
Performing below potential (60th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
30.6% Below average
Lighting 37.5
Reflection 43.6
Parallax 37.6
31% 39.6 fps
MRender 40
Gravity 39.4
Splatting 34.5
31% 38 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 30.6%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 250GB-$251
115GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXT08B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 217 217 211 228 210 185 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
74.6% Very good
Read 453
Write 201
Mixed 155
SusWrite 211
56% 255 MB/s
4K Read 26.3
4K Write 68
4K Mixed 23.9
106% 39.4 MB/s
DQ Read 343
DQ Write 179
DQ Mixed 58.8
98% 194 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 74.6%
Great: 85%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
125GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 96 97 98 96 109 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
10.4% Very poor
Read 84.5
Write 92.4
Mixed 87.3
SusWrite 101
21% 91.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
3% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 10.4%
Great: 124%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown JAC1600S1108 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
54.3% Above average
MC Read 20.8
MC Write 18.5
MC Mixed 16.7
53% 18.7 GB/s
SC Read 17
SC Write 17.6
SC Mixed 17.3
49% 17.3 GB/s
Latency 75.7
53% 75.7 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 54.3%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M17xR4 Builds (Compare 672 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Alienware M17xR4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 46% - Average Total price: $520
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback