Asus ROG MAXIMUS X HERO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 121%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 114%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics124% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive146% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus ROG MAXIMUS X HERO  (all builds)
Memory25.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180914
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 28 '23 at 10:17
Run Duration341 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$179
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
96.1% Outstanding
Memory 91.1
1-Core 152
2-Core 261
94% 168 Pts
4-Core 542
8-Core 881
87% 712 Pts
64-Core 1,190
74% 1,190 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 96.1%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 531.68
Performing below potential (55th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
124% Outstanding
Lighting 169
Reflection 182
Parallax 178
138% 176 fps
MRender 132
Gravity 176
Splatting 121
116% 143 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 124%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 500GB
353GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 624 574 580 558 572 572 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
146% Outstanding
Read 1,059
Write 789
Mixed 696
SusWrite 580
175% 781 MB/s
4K Read 37.2
4K Write 76.1
4K Mixed 48.5
159% 53.9 MB/s
DQ Read 447
DQ Write 412
DQ Mixed 428
322% 429 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 146%
Great: 313%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$135
693GB free
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 423 452 462 462 469 471 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
118% Outstanding
Read 500
Write 465
Mixed 436
SusWrite 456
105% 464 MB/s
4K Read 39.5
4K Write 83.2
4K Mixed 52.7
171% 58.5 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 360
271% 363 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 118%
Great: 133%
Crucial P1 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$88
92GB free
Firmware: P3CR010 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 594 17 95 99 433 29 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
170% Outstanding
Read 1287
Write 1,164
Mixed 948
SusWrite 211
201% 903 MB/s
4K Read 51.8
4K Write 116
4K Mixed 67.8
227% 78.5 MB/s
DQ Read 687
DQ Write 908
DQ Mixed 274
353% 623 MB/s
Poor: 130%
This bench: 170%
Great: 295%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$148
443GB free
Firmware: 1B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1501 1258 1258 1257 1256 1262 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
297% Outstanding
Read 2,426
Write 2238
Mixed 1625
SusWrite 1,299
425% 1,897 MB/s
4K Read 53.9
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 71.9
233% 79.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,171
DQ Write 1,006
DQ Mixed 1,073
809% 1,084 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 297%
Great: 372%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$135
108GB free
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 481 480 483 482 481 482 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 460
Write 464
Mixed 414
SusWrite 481
103% 455 MB/s
4K Read 37.4
4K Write 83.6
4K Mixed 50.3
165% 57.1 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 343
DQ Mixed 361
272% 363 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 116%
Great: 133%
WD My Passport 259D 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 259d
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 108 109 108 107 109 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
45.9% Average
Read 109
Write 107
Mixed 54.3
SusWrite 108
126% 94.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
100% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 45.9%
Great: 43%
WD My Passport Essential 1TB
683GB free, PID 070a
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 41 41 40 41 42 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
20% Very poor
Read 61.2
Write 28.4
Mixed 27.1
SusWrite 40.2
49% 39.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.6
47% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 20%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 4000 C19 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2747 MHz
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
89% Excellent
MC Read 32.5
MC Write 34.9
MC Mixed 26.9
90% 31.4 GB/s
SC Read 20.1
SC Write 38.8
SC Mixed 26.4
81% 28.4 GB/s
Latency 65.5
61% 65.5 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 89%
Great: 120%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG MAXIMUS X HERO Builds (Compare 3,690 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 112%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 103%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG MAXIMUS X HERO - $250

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $1,120
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback