Asus ROG STRIX Z370-E GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 76%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 69%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics91.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive66.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX Z370-E GAMING  (all builds)
Memory22.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190118
Uptime15.2 Days
Run DateApr 28 '23 at 03:15
Run Duration271 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 39%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700-$200
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
79.8% Very good
Memory 82.5
1-Core 119
2-Core 228
80% 143 Pts
4-Core 415
8-Core 689
67% 552 Pts
64-Core 811
50% 811 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 79.8%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$294
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 531.41
Performing below potential (72nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
91.9% Outstanding
Lighting 117
Reflection 104
Parallax 105
96% 109 fps
MRender 133
Gravity 99.4
Splatting 86.8
85% 106 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 91.9%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra 3D 250GB-$50
47GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X61170RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 135 92 133 138 101 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
66.9% Good
Read 423
Write 254
Mixed 175
SusWrite 127
54% 245 MB/s
4K Read 20.3
4K Write 40.9
4K Mixed 28.4
89% 29.9 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 267
DQ Mixed 253
208% 299 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 66.9%
Great: 106%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$95
462GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1711 1734 1650 1633 1648 1567 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
274% Outstanding
Read 2,176
Write 1870
Mixed 1,565
SusWrite 1,657
408% 1,817 MB/s
4K Read 44.9
4K Write 77.3
4K Mixed 54.2
178% 58.8 MB/s
DQ Read 872
DQ Write 512
DQ Mixed 700
519% 695 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 274%
Great: 410%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
193GB free
Firmware: 1B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 816 646 634 615 602 605 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
177% Outstanding
Read 1,294
Write 1,087
Mixed 1,047
SusWrite 653
229% 1,020 MB/s
4K Read 41.1
4K Write 73.2
4K Mixed 54.1
170% 56.1 MB/s
DQ Read 887
DQ Write 558
DQ Mixed 698
527% 714 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 177%
Great: 340%
Toshiba MK7559GSXP 750GB-$118
596GB free
Firmware: GN001C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 95 94 95 95 94 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
52.6% Above average
Read 89.2
Write 93.5
Mixed 18.9
SusWrite 94
53% 73.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
113% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 52.6%
Great: 56%
Seagate ST500LX012-SSHD-8GB 500GB
465GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 105 95 107 104 102 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
61.2% Good
Read 109
Write 102
Mixed 58.2
SusWrite 103
68% 93 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 6.8
4K Mixed 1.2
288% 2.9 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 61.2%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 CMR16GX4M2D3000C16 CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 CMR16GX4M2D3000C16 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
64.7% Good
MC Read 23.6
MC Write 25.1
MC Mixed 20.6
66% 23.1 GB/s
SC Read 12.4
SC Write 24
SC Mixed 18.7
52% 18.4 GB/s
Latency 76.1
53% 76.1 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 64.7%
Great: 96%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX Z370-E GAMING Builds (Compare 10,630 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 111%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX Z370-E GAMING - $210

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $986
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4070 $490Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback