HP Laptop 15s-du0xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics9.95% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive172% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Laptop 15s-du0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 85F0
Memory12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211015
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 27 '23 at 12:16
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8265U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
61.6% Good
Memory 90.1
1-Core 110
2-Core 88.7
65% 96.2 Pts
4-Core 179
8-Core 456
36% 318 Pts
64-Core 421
26% 421 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 61.6%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia MX130
HP(103C 85F0) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.2656
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
9.95% Terrible
Lighting 12.5
Reflection 11.4
Parallax 12.4
10% 12.1 fps
MRender 12.5
Gravity 13.9
Splatting 9.3
10% 11.9 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 9.95%
Great: 10%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Transcend TS256GMTE110S 256GB
196GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U1006A3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 632 766 803 694 659 647 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
172% Outstanding
Read 1,437
Write 938
Mixed 854
SusWrite 700
219% 982 MB/s
4K Read 43.5
4K Write 130
4K Mixed 34.5
179% 69.2 MB/s
DQ Read 375
DQ Write 474
DQ Mixed 361
290% 403 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 172%
Great: 191%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB
643GB free
Firmware: JU004C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 84 89 90 89 87 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
65.7% Good
Read 139
Write 141
Mixed 52
SusWrite 88.5
76% 105 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 6.1
4K Mixed 0.6
238% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 65.7%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD Transcend JM3200HSB-8G 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
74.1% Very good
MC Read 28.1
MC Write 28.6
MC Mixed 21.4
74% 26 GB/s
SC Read 15.8
SC Write 29.7
SC Mixed 23.6
66% 23 GB/s
Latency 67
60% 67 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 74.1%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Laptop 15s-du0xxx Builds (Compare 229 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: HP Laptop 15s-du0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback