Asus TUF H310M-PLUS GAMING/BR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics99.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive55.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF H310M-PLUS GAMING/BR  (all builds)
Memory10.7 GB free of 20 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200527
Uptime4.3 Days
Run DateApr 27 '23 at 01:33
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400F-$85
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
62.3% Good
Memory 77.3
1-Core 83.2
2-Core 156
62% 106 Pts
4-Core 270
8-Core 294
37% 282 Pts
64-Core 246
15% 246 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 62.3%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$288
MSI(1462 C757) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2205 MHz, MLim: 3600 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 531.68
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
99.2% Outstanding
Lighting 125
Reflection 139
Parallax 121
102% 128 fps
MRender 145
Gravity 106
Splatting 99.8
94% 117 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 99.2%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$26
23GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK61K1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 133 55 110 71 97 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
55.6% Above average
Read 330
Write 290
Mixed 255
SusWrite 87.5
54% 241 MB/s
4K Read 23.2
4K Write 44.9
4K Mixed 24.6
90% 30.9 MB/s
DQ Read 244
DQ Write 173
DQ Mixed 8.7
60% 142 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 55.6%
Great: 85%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 1TB
786GB free
Firmware: 2AR10002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 98 53 93 100 100 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
49.9% Average
Read 83.2
Write 55
Mixed 49.5
SusWrite 90.4
51% 69.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
128% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 49.9%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX2400C15D4/4G KHX2400C15/16G 20GB
2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 16384 MB
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
39% Below average
MC Read 13
MC Write 13.1
MC Mixed 13.7
38% 13.3 GB/s
SC Read 10.4
SC Write 13.5
SC Mixed 11.6
34% 11.8 GB/s
Latency 85.7
47% 85.7 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 39%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF H310M-PLUS GAMING/BR Builds (Compare 1,382 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus TUF H310M-PLUS GAMING/BR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $247
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback