HP Z620 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.88% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive47.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Z620 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 158A
Memory12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180209
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateApr 26 '23 at 16:47
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User PAK-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-4620 v2
CPU0, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
65.5% Good
Memory 76.4
1-Core 68.4
2-Core 149
58% 98 Pts
4-Core 294
8-Core 572
51% 433 Pts
64-Core 1,490
92% 1,490 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 65.5%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 2000
HP(103C 084A) 1GB
CLim: 625 MHz, MLim: 652 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 372.95
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
5.88% Terrible
Lighting 6.8
Reflection 9.1
Parallax 6.6
6% 7.5 fps
MRender 9.3
Gravity 8.1
Splatting 7
6% 8.13 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 5.88%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SA400S37/240G 240GB
189GB free (System drive)
Firmware: A25E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 145 145 76 59 51 MB/s
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
47.7% Average
Read 245
Write 149
Mixed 190
SusWrite 104
38% 172 MB/s
4K Read 27.8
4K Write 48.6
4K Mixed 12.7
84% 29.7 MB/s
DQ Read 159
DQ Write 169
DQ Mixed 17.6
54% 115 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 47.7%
Great: 86%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$25
459GB free
Firmware: 1H18
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 126 126 127 127 127 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
73.2% Very good
Read 129
Write 128
Mixed 81.7
SusWrite 126
85% 116 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
153% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 73.2%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B1K70CH0-YH9 2x8GB
2 of 12 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
29.8% Poor
MC Read 16.4
MC Write 7.1
MC Mixed 7.7
30% 10.4 GB/s
SC Read 8.9
SC Write 4.7
SC Mixed 5.2
18% 6.27 GB/s
Latency 87.6
46% 87.6 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 29.8%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z620 Workstation Builds (Compare 2,424 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

System: HP Z620 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $345
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback