Asus Rampage Formula

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (12th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 88 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics13.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive6.26% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (79%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus Rampage Formula  (all builds)
Memory4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20100311
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 26 '23 at 07:50
Run Duration299 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 79%

 PC Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo E8500-$110
LGA775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.15 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
36.9% Below average
Memory 65
1-Core 31.5
2-Core 53.2
35% 49.9 Pts
4-Core 53.8
8-Core 53.3
7% 53.5 Pts
64-Core 59.5
4% 59.5 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 36.9%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-$120
Asus(1043 84F0) 2GB
CLim: 1333 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
13.1% Very poor
Lighting 18.3
Reflection 17.8
Parallax 16.2
15% 17.4 fps
MRender 22.7
Gravity 17.7
Splatting 0.2
10% 13.5 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13.1%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 120GB-$109
78GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXT07B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 32 21 55 35 43 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
6.26% Terrible
Read 43.3
Write 44.6
Mixed 46.9
SusWrite 36.6
10% 42.8 MB/s
4K Read 2.1
4K Write 5.3
4K Mixed 1.4
8% 2.93 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 6.26%
Great: 73%
Samsung SP2514N 250GB
24GB free
Firmware: VF100-33
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 10 35 22 33 34 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
15.7% Very poor
Read 28.8
Write 32
Mixed 24.6
SusWrite 25.8
21% 27.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.4
72% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 15.7%
Great: 38%
Seagate ST3250820ACE 250GB
8GB free
Firmware: 3.ACD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 18 28 29 34 32 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
17.2% Very poor
Read 32.7
Write 34.3
Mixed 25.2
SusWrite 27
22% 29.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.5
83% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 17.2%
Great: 41%
Hitachi HDT725050VLA360 500GB-$159
51GB free
Firmware: V56OA7EA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 23 24 25 28 19 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
15.2% Very poor
Read 28.9
Write 32.6
Mixed 21.6
SusWrite 24
20% 26.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.4
79% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 15.2%
Great: 40%
Samsung Spinpoint T166 500GB-$40
176GB free
Firmware: CR100-10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 22 30 50 50 34 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
18.8% Very poor
Read 26.9
Write 27.3
Mixed 20.1
SusWrite 38.6
21% 28.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.2
40% 0.27 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 18.8%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR2
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
15.3% Very poor
MC Read 4.9
MC Write 4.9
MC Mixed 4.6
14% 4.8 GB/s
SC Read 4
SC Write 4.3
SC Mixed 3.6
11% 3.97 GB/s
Latency 114
35% 114 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 15.3%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Rampage Formula Builds (Compare 138 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus Rampage Formula

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $248
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback