Medion H77H2-EM

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (48%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMedion H77H2-EM  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION H77H2-EM
Memory7.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120411
Uptime6 Days
Run DateApr 25 '23 at 19:36
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 48%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3450-$59
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
43.3% Average
Memory 60.9
1-Core 71.9
2-Core 126
51% 86.4 Pts
4-Core 165
8-Core 80.4
18% 123 Pts
64-Core 112
7% 112 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 43.3%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 530
Asus(1043 839B) 2GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 376.54
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
3% Terrible
Lighting 3.4
Reflection 4.9
Parallax 1.5
3% 3.27 fps
MRender 5.5
Gravity 4.3
Splatting 3.3
4% 4.37 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$25
727GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 128 134 156 177 161 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
82.6% Excellent
Read 142
Write 173
Mixed 75.1
SusWrite 146
98% 134 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
146% 1 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 82.6%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown M2F8G64CC8HD5N-DI 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
39.9% Below average
MC Read 14.2
MC Write 16
MC Mixed 14.2
42% 14.8 GB/s
SC Read 8.2
SC Write 8.9
SC Mixed 9.2
25% 8.77 GB/s
Latency 125
32% 125 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 39.9%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H77H2-EM Builds (Compare 182 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: Medion H77H2-EM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 50% - Average Total price: $543
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback