Fujitsu FMVA0400L

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.84% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive62.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemFujitsu FMVA0400L  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU FJNB26D
Memory3.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140619
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateApr 25 '23 at 15:13
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User MDG-User
Background CPU 33%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4300M-$264
Onboard, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
49.9% Average
Memory 78.8
1-Core 76.7
2-Core 143
60% 99.6 Pts
4-Core 123
8-Core 134
17% 129 Pts
64-Core 180
11% 180 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 49.9%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Fujitsu(10CF 17AB) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5171
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
1.84% Terrible
Lighting 2.1
Reflection 2.1
Parallax 3
2% 2.4 fps
MRender 2.6
Gravity 0.8
Splatting 3.8
2% 2.4 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.84%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 240GB-$28
39GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR013
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 328 5.8 84 94 6.7 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
62.5% Good
Read 455
Write 384
Mixed 359
SusWrite 108
73% 327 MB/s
4K Read 23.8
4K Write 53.7
4K Mixed 23.2
94% 33.6 MB/s
DQ Read 213
DQ Write 198
DQ Mixed 42
76% 151 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 62.5%
Great: 92%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451S6BFR8A-PB Samsung M471B5173QH0-YK0 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
38.4% Below average
MC Read 12.2
MC Write 15.1
MC Mixed 13.9
39% 13.7 GB/s
SC Read 8.4
SC Write 8.1
SC Mixed 7.5
23% 8 GB/s
Latency 82.7
48% 82.7 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 38.4%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical FMVA0400L Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu FMVA0400L

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $292
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback