Asus TUF GAMING X570-PRO WIFI II

Performance Results


Gaming 222% UFO	Desktop 100% UFO	Workstation 210% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	243% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	347% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Run History

12 months ago, 12 months ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING X570-PRO WIFI II (all builds)
Memory	26.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit색
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20230223
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 25 '23 at 15:13
Run Duration	403 Seconds
Run User	KOR-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D-$310 20,824 User benchmarks, average bench 104% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	93.3% Outstanding	Memory 96.9 1-Core 131 2-Core 264 92% 164 Pts	4-Core 482 8-Core 857 81% 670 Pts	64-Core 1,178 73% 1,178 Pts
Poor: 92% ↑ This bench: 93.3% Great: 111%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4070-Ti-$750 46,082 User benchmarks, average bench 240% Asus(1043 88A3) CLim: 3120 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 531.41 Performing below potential (55^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	243% Outstanding	Lighting 353 Reflection 341 Parallax 408 287% 367 fps	MRender 489 Gravity 298 Splatting 215 259% 334 fps
Poor: 208% ↑ This bench: 243% Great: 256%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$170 138,083 User benchmarks, average bench 416% 2TB free (System drive) Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1890 2022 2082 2183 2187 2196 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	347% Outstanding	Read 2,455 Write 2,095 Mixed 2,243 SusWrite 2,093 500% 2,222 MB/s	4K Read 58.4 4K Write 108 4K Mixed 74.6 241% 80.4 MB/s	DQ Read 854 DQ Write 1,225 DQ Mixed 976 756% 1,018 MB/s
Poor: 283% ↑ This bench: 347% Great: 526%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB 7,232 User benchmarks, average bench 279% 133GB free Firmware: 1B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 2,783 Write 2,588 Mixed 2,304 570% 2,558 MB/s	4K Read 69.4 4K Write 145 4K Mixed 94.1 302% 103 MB/s	DQ Read 1,084 DQ Write 920 DQ Mixed 996 748% 1,000 MB/s
Poor: 182% Great: 389%
Intel 750 Series NVMe PCIe 400GB-$550 8,641 User benchmarks, average bench 186% 245GB free Firmware: 8EV10171 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 929 931 937 936 933 877 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	201% Outstanding	Read 736 Write 951 Mixed 647 SusWrite 924 184% 815 MB/s	4K Read 40.3 4K Write 178 4K Mixed 53.2 223% 90.4 MB/s	DQ Read 1,182 DQ Write 952 DQ Mixed 996 765% 1,043 MB/s
Poor: 123% ↑ This bench: 201% Great: 230%
Marshal MAL34000SA-T72 4TB 29 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 738GB free Firmware: FJ1M SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 127 130 126 130 125 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	82.1% Excellent	Read 158 Write 170 Mixed 93.3 SusWrite 128 101% 137 MB/s	4K Read 1.7 4K Write 2.9 4K Mixed 1 236% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 82.1% Great: 111%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$87 42,465 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 542GB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 93 94 90 90 88 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	45.4% Average	Read 66.9 Write 87.1 Mixed 65.7 SusWrite 91.5 58% 77.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0 43% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 45.4% Great: 90%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79 179,101 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 1.5TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 131 131 127 131 128 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	56.5% Above average	Read 67.3 Write 114 Mixed 60.2 SusWrite 129 68% 92.8 MB/s	4K Read 1.6 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0 76% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 56.5% Great: 90%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79 179,101 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 216GB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 92 115 106 95 90 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	46.4% Average	Read 63.3 Write 111 Mixed 69.2 SusWrite 98.3 63% 85.4 MB/s	4K Read 1.6 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0 76% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 46.4% Great: 90%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80 85,620 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 8GB free Firmware: MX6OABB0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 90 91 90 91 91 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	51.7% Above average	Read 89.2 Write 91.8 Mixed 32.6 SusWrite 90.5 55% 76 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.8 170% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 51.7% Great: 107%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79 179,101 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 2TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 103 106 103 104 102 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	69.2% Good	Read 138 Write 150 Mixed 62.2 SusWrite 103 83% 113 MB/s	4K Read 1.6 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0 76% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 69.2% Great: 90%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$60 67,711 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 12GB free Firmware: CC52 SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 95 136 121 167 99 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	66.9% Good	Read 106 Write 87.5 Mixed 63.7 SusWrite 127 71% 96.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.6 112% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 66.9% Great: 96%
Tdas TerraMaster 6TB 20 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 169GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 13 13 13 13 13 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	14.9% Very poor	Read 37.2 Write 37.6 Mixed 33.1 SusWrite 13.2 23% 30.3 MB/s	4K Read 2 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 0.7 213% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 14.9% Great: 120%
Tdas TerraMaster 8TB 36 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 5.5TB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 36 38 37 37 37 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	26.1% Poor	Read 53.2 Write 32.4 Mixed 33.9 SusWrite 36.6 29% 39 MB/s	4K Read 2.1 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 0.7 210% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 26.1% Great: 112%
Tdas TerraMaster 8TB 36 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 532GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 13 13 13 13 13 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	14.7% Very poor	Read 37 Write 37.9 Mixed 33.9 SusWrite 13 23% 30.5 MB/s	4K Read 1.9 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 0.5 187% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 14.7% Great: 112%
Asmedia USB 3.0 Device 2TB 31 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 468GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 79 81 80 82 84 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	38.3% Below average	Read 51.9 Write 58.7 Mixed 52.5 SusWrite 81.3 45% 61.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.6 126% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 38.3% Great: 98%
Asmedia USB 3.0 Device 4TB 12 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 205GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 80 80 79 81 81 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	45.4% Average	Read 77 Write 117 Mixed 109 SusWrite 80.2 72% 95.8 MB/s	4K Read 4 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0 176% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 45.4% Great: 72%
Tdas TerraMaster 8TB 36 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 3TB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.7 6.9 6.9 7 6.9 7.2 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	12.9% Very poor	Read 37 Write 38.2 Mixed 34.6 SusWrite 6.9 22% 29.2 MB/s	4K Read 2 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.6 187% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 12.9% Great: 112%
Tdas TerraMaster 8TB 36 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 3TB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.4 6.9 7 7.1 6.9 7 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 13% Great: 112%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378A2G43AB3-CWE 2x16GB 2,006 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	101% Outstanding	MC Read 47.2 MC Write 23.8 MC Mixed 37.2 103% 36.1 GB/s	SC Read 28.6 SC Write 23.7 SC Mixed 35 83% 29.1 GB/s	Latency 50.8 79% 50.8 ns
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 107%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PRO WIFI II Builds (Compare 327 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 183%

UFO

Desktop 103%

UFO

Workstation 201%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PRO WIFI II

CPU
Ryzen 9 5900XAMD $245Bench 99%, 60,132 samples	83x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $199Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	59x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $115Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	54x

GPU
RTX 3080Nvidia $899Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	35x
RTX 3070-TiNvidia $479Bench 158%, 218,061 samples	23x
RTX 3060Nvidia $250Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	22x

SSD
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $106Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	27x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TBSamsung $150Bench 336%, 200,600 samples	14x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	13x

RAM
CMH32GX4M2D3600C18 2x16GBCorsairBench 94%, 38,830 samples	13x
CMH32GX4M2Z3600C18 2x16GBCorsairBench 97%, 7,413 samples	8x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 89%, 92,468 samples	8x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 67% - Good

Total price: $1,250

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $289	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16