Dell XPS 8900

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 87%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics107% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive76.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemDell XPS 8900  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0XJ8C4
Memory41.3 GB free of 48 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20160506
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 03 '17 at 05:40
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 15%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700-$170
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
80.5% Excellent
Memory 79.2
1-Core 114
2-Core 221
77% 138 Pts
4-Core 440
8-Core 632
67% 536 Pts
64-Core 652
40% 652 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 80.5%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 384.94
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Lighting 140
Reflection 155
Parallax 132
114% 143 fps
MRender 118
Gravity 134
Splatting 112
98% 121 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 107%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WDS100T1B0A-00H9 1TB
319GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X411 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
76.5% Very good
Read 490
Write 252
Mixed 248
72% 330 MB/s
4K Read 30.2
4K Write 67.2
4K Mixed 17.5
104% 38.3 MB/s
DQ Read 316
DQ Write 188
DQ Mixed 42.3
88% 182 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 76.5%
Great: 85%
Toshib MG04ACA400N 4TB
3TB free
Firmware: FJ2D Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
97.3% Outstanding
Read 172
Write 168
Mixed 167
127% 169 MB/s
4K Read 0.83
4K Write 1.18
4K Mixed 0.32
92% 0.78 MB/s
Poor: 103%
This bench: 97.3%
Great: 110%
Generic- SD/MMC 64GB
59GB free, PID 6362
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
23.8% Poor
Read 39.5
Write 38.2
Mixed 38.8
50% 38.9 MB/s
4K Read 5.85
4K Write 2.72
4K Mixed 1.65
170% 3.41 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 23.8%
Great: 23%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA41GU6AFR8N-TF HMA41GU6AFR8N-TF 48GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
16384, 16384, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
69.9% Good
MC Read 24.6
MC Write 27.1
MC Mixed 23.5
72% 25.1 GB/s
SC Read 15.8
SC Write 24.8
SC Mixed 21.1
59% 20.6 GB/s
Latency 81.9
49% 81.9 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 69.9%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical XPS 8900 Builds (Compare 2,803 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Dell XPS 8900

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $370
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback