HP Desktop M01-F1xxx

Performance Results

Gaming 126%
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation 124%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics132% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive213% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP Desktop M01-F1xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8768
Memory11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230220
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 24 '23 at 05:56
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 31%
Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10700-$235
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
95.3% Outstanding
Memory 93.5
1-Core 129
2-Core 280
92% 167 Pts
4-Core 521
8-Core 965
89% 743 Pts
64-Core 1,348
84% 1,348 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 95.3%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$270
HP(103C 8552) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2205 MHz, MLim: 3600 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 526.56
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
132% Outstanding
Lighting 179
Reflection 180
Parallax 199
146% 186 fps
MRender 193
Gravity 156
Splatting 132
128% 160 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 132%
Great: 134%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba XG5 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB
812GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AADA4105 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 985 963 1140 1152 901 909 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
213% Outstanding
Read 1,469
Write 1,426
Mixed 1,230
SusWrite 1,008
289% 1,283 MB/s
4K Read 34.9
4K Write 83.2
4K Mixed 48.6
159% 55.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,018
DQ Write 947
DQ Mixed 785
643% 917 MB/s
Poor: 99%
This bench: 213%
Great: 251%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CTD 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
82.7% Excellent
MC Read 31.7
MC Write 31.8
MC Mixed 22.7
82% 28.7 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 37
SC Mixed 27
78% 27.4 GB/s
Latency 61
66% 61 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 82.7%
Great: 96%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Desktop M01-F1xxx Builds (Compare 1,124 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop 75%
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: HP Desktop M01-F1xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 109% - Outstanding Total price: $90
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback