Asus ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING WIFI II

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 189%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 183%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics195% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive457% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING WIFI II  (all builds)
Memory17.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220428
Uptime3.9 Days
Run DateApr 24 '23 at 04:45
Run Duration318 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D-$305
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
99.2% Outstanding
Memory 91.3
1-Core 160
2-Core 308
102% 186 Pts
4-Core 574
8-Core 967
94% 771 Pts
64-Core 1,373
85% 1,373 Pts
Poor: 92%
This bench: 99.2%
Great: 111%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$879
EVGA(3842 4897) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 531.41
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
195% Outstanding
Lighting 290
Reflection 242
Parallax 283
237% 272 fps
MRender 312
Gravity 226
Splatting 166
184% 235 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 195%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN850X NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$146
830GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 620311WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3256 3779 1573 1776 1703 1637 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
457% Outstanding
Read 4,222
Write 4,498
Mixed 3,194
SusWrite 2,287
797% 3,551 MB/s
4K Read 67.8
4K Write 206
4K Mixed 87.9
324% 120 MB/s
DQ Read 1,165
DQ Write 1,039
DQ Mixed 1,070
811% 1,091 MB/s
Poor: 283%
This bench: 457%
Great: 685%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
61GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 443 478 479 438 346 246 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 480
Write 478
Mixed 385
SusWrite 405
98% 437 MB/s
4K Read 41.5
4K Write 99.5
4K Mixed 54.9
186% 65.3 MB/s
DQ Read 388
DQ Write 247
DQ Mixed 345
250% 327 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 116%
Great: 134%
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$90
526GB free
Firmware: 2B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1204 1460 1460 1490 1513 1551 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
275% Outstanding
Read 1,638
Write 1,686
Mixed 1,592
SusWrite 1,446
359% 1,591 MB/s
4K Read 55.6
4K Write 137
4K Mixed 74.2
252% 88.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,005
DQ Write 910
DQ Mixed 948
714% 954 MB/s
Poor: 149%
This bench: 275%
Great: 365%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 5TB
549GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 444 212 82 82 80 79 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
95.9% Outstanding
Read 478
Write 462
Mixed 389
SusWrite 163
84% 373 MB/s
4K Read 32
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 46.6
162% 60.2 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 361
DQ Mixed 368
277% 369 MB/s
Poor: 85%
This bench: 95.9%
Great: 105%
WD WD20NPVT-00Z2TT0 2TB
690GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 87 90 86 82 87 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
44.9% Average
Read 70.3
Write 69
Mixed 41
SusWrite 85.8
49% 66.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 44.9%
Great: 61%
WD My Book 25EE 6TB
1.5TB free, PID 25ee
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 130 131 131 134 131 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
55.9% Above average
Read 133
Write 137
Mixed 111
SusWrite 131
175% 128 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
123% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 55.9%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
74.3% Very good
MC Read 33.9
MC Write 16
MC Mixed 28
74% 26 GB/s
SC Read 25.7
SC Write 15.9
SC Mixed 28.6
67% 23.4 GB/s
Latency 65.2
61% 65.2 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 74.3%
Great: 118%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING WIFI II Builds (Compare 2,126 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 102%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING WIFI II

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 114% - Outstanding Total price: $648
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback