Asrock H610M-HDV/M.2 R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics74.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive238% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock H610M-HDV/M.2 R2.0  (all builds)
Memory11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220919
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 24 '23 at 02:04
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-12100F-$85
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
87.1% Excellent
Memory 71.3
1-Core 175
2-Core 318
99% 188 Pts
4-Core 554
8-Core 787
84% 670 Pts
64-Core 802
50% 802 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 87.1%
Great: 99%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3050-$240
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 531.68
Performing below potential (61st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
74.9% Very good
Lighting 101
Reflection 84.9
Parallax 89.9
83% 92 fps
MRender 84.8
Gravity 73.4
Splatting 65.7
60% 74.6 fps
Poor: 69%
This bench: 74.9%
Great: 79%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ax3600 256GB 256GB
194GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EDFM90.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 866 901 717 955 997 596 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
238% Outstanding
Read 1,145
Write 1,377
Mixed 1,157
SusWrite 839
255% 1,129 MB/s
4K Read 58.6
4K Write 237
4K Mixed 85.7
324% 127 MB/s
DQ Read 668
DQ Write 1,188
DQ Mixed 799
643% 885 MB/s
Poor: 84%
This bench: 238%
Great: 238%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
212GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 26 37 26 23 33 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 52% Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
PNY Inc 8GBF1X08QFHH38-135-K 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
71% Very good
MC Read 25.3
MC Write 26.8
MC Mixed 24.3
73% 25.5 GB/s
SC Read 18
SC Write 27
SC Mixed 21.6
63% 22.2 GB/s
Latency 98.4
41% 98.4 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 71%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H610M-HDV/M.2 R2.0 Builds (Compare 203 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 101%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 95%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asrock H610M-HDV/M.2 R2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $376
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback