MSI X299 GAMING PRO CARBON AC (MS-7A95)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics80.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (53%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
13 months ago, 13 months ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7A95
MotherboardMSI X299 GAMING PRO CARBON AC (MS-7A95)  (all builds)
Memory39.7 GB free of 48 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170602
Uptime6.9 Days
Run DateApr 23 '23 at 19:51
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 53%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7740X-$130
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.3 GHz, turbo 4.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
82.1% Excellent
Memory 94.6
1-Core 108
2-Core 250
84% 151 Pts
4-Core 375
8-Core 678
63% 526 Pts
64-Core 697
43% 697 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 82.1%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560
EVGA(3842 1996) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1531 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (68th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
80.8% Excellent
Lighting 100
Reflection 119
Parallax 105
82% 108 fps
MRender 101
Gravity 101
Splatting 91.4
79% 97.8 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 80.8%
Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
15GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2401
Write 1,111
Mixed 1543
371% 1,685 MB/s
4K Read 49.8
4K Write 105
4K Mixed 65.3
215% 73.5 MB/s
DQ Read 953
DQ Write 680
DQ Mixed 915
657% 849 MB/s
Poor: 199% Great: 340%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
119GB free
Firmware: KC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 88 90 90 90 89 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
52.2% Above average
Read 92.8
Write 90
Mixed 54.4
SusWrite 89.1
60% 81.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.8
135% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 52.2%
Great: 88%
Seagate Barracuda 6TB (2017)-$87
4.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 165 172 170 170 161 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
81.5% Excellent
Read 120
Write 125
Mixed 68.1
SusWrite 163
87% 119 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 0.8
246% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 81.5%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F4-3200C16-16GTZRX 04CD F4-3200C16-8GTZR 04CD F4-3200C16-16GTZRX 04CD F4-3200C16-8GTZR 48GB
3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz
16384, 8192, 16384, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
103% Outstanding
MC Read 36.6
MC Write 41.1
MC Mixed 33.1
106% 36.9 GB/s
SC Read 22.6
SC Write 40.8
SC Mixed 30.5
89% 31.3 GB/s
Latency 58.1
69% 58.1 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 103%
Great: 99%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X299 GAMING PRO CARBON AC (MS-7A95) Builds (Compare 439 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 98%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 92%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: MSI X299 GAMING PRO CARBON AC (MS-7A95)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $791
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback