TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Lenovo 90NA000LUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics42.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive249% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 90NA000LUS  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 370A
Memory7.3 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230116
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 23 '23 at 17:33
Run Duration109 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 11%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10700-$226
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
89.7% Excellent
Memory 92.6
1-Core 130
2-Core 232
87% 151 Pts
4-Core 465
8-Core 970
84% 717 Pts
64-Core 1,281
79% 1,281 Pts
Poor: 75% ↑
This bench: 89.7%
 Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$150
Sapphire(174B A548) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 472.80
Performing below potential (48th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
42.3% Average
Lighting 54.8
Reflection 56.7
Parallax 48.2
45% 53.2 fps
MRender 42.1
Gravity 50.9
Splatting 45.4
38% 46.1 fps
Poor: 39% ↑
This bench: 42.3%
 Great: 46%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme SAMSUNG MZVLB256HBHQ-000L7 256GB
192GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4M2QEXH7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1130 401 404 409 407 404 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
249% Outstanding
Read 2,348
Write 2,203
Mixed 1540
SusWrite 526
369% 1,654 MB/s
4K Read 59.4
4K Write 134
4K Mixed 79.5
263% 91.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,003
DQ Write 855
DQ Mixed 924
694% 927 MB/s
Poor: 182% ↑
This bench: 249%
 Great: 303%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GU6DJR8N-WM HMA851U6DJR6N-WM 12GB
2933, 2933 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
51.2% Above average
MC Read 19.2
MC Write 17.5
MC Mixed 13.7
48% 16.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.1
SC Write 20.4
SC Mixed 19.2
51% 17.9 GB/s
Latency 62.8
64% 62.8 ns
Poor: 27% ↑
This bench: 51.2%
 Great: 70%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical 90NA000LUS Builds (Compare 19 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 90NA000LUS

CPU
Core i7-10700Intel  $226Bench 93%, 71,010 samples19x
GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 39,219 samples6x
GTX 1650Nvidia  $150Bench 43%, 259,091 samples6x
RX 550AMD  $79Bench 14%, 79,894 samples4x
SSD
MZVLB256HBHQ-000L7 256GBSamsungBench 188%, 10,512 samples5x
Raid 0 Volume 480GBIntelBench 105%, 11,256 samples3x
MTFDDAK256MAY-1AH12ABHA 256GBCrucialBench 83%, 1,792 samples2x
RAM
M378A1K43DB2-CVF M378A5244CB0-CVF 12GBSamsungBench 61%, 78 samples8x
HMA81GU6DJR8N-WM HMA851U6DJR6N-WM 12GBHynixBench 53%, 24 samples5x
M378A1K43DB2-CVF 2x8GBSamsungBench 79%, 1,448 samples3x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $226
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback