Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603ZM_GU603ZM

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 102%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics97% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
13 months ago, 13 months ago.
SystemAsus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603ZM_GU603ZM  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK GU603ZM
Memory10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221222
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateApr 23 '23 at 13:26
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-12700H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Memory 77.4
1-Core 186
2-Core 369
110% 211 Pts
4-Core 680
8-Core 1,201
113% 940 Pts
64-Core 2,027
126% 2,027 Pts
Poor: 91%
This bench: 102%
Great: 102%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060 (Laptop)
Asus(1043 1A7C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3550 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 531.68
Performing below potential (70th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
97% Outstanding
Lighting 127
Reflection 176
Parallax 122
103% 142 fps
MRender 139
Gravity 95.8
Splatting 86.6
85% 107 fps
Poor: 67%
This bench: 97%
Great: 105%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme Micron_2450_MTFDKBA512TFK 512GB
396GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V5MA010 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,698
Write 3,186
Mixed 1,764
500% 2,216 MB/s
4K Read 73.8
4K Write 295
4K Mixed 92.7
387% 154 MB/s
DQ Read 1,474
DQ Write 1,315
DQ Mixed 1,352
1,026% 1,381 MB/s
Poor: 99% Great: 305%
Nvme CT1000P5 1TB
850GB free
Firmware: P7CR403 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 3,980
Write 4,318
Mixed 2,783
824% 3,694 MB/s
4K Read 70.3
4K Write 215
4K Mixed 104
353% 130 MB/s
DQ Read 1,677
DQ Write 1,449
DQ Mixed 1,575
1,177% 1,567 MB/s
Poor: 179% Great: 500%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron MTC4C10163S1SC48BA1 Samsung M425R1GB4BB0-CQKOD 16GB
4800, 4800 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
139% Outstanding
MC Read 59.9
MC Write 50
MC Mixed 50.4
153% 53.4 GB/s
SC Read 19.5
SC Write 48.1
SC Mixed 27.8
91% 31.8 GB/s
Latency 85.4
47% 85.4 ns
Poor: 90%
This bench: 139%
Great: 139%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603ZM_GU603ZM Builds (Compare 1,224 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 92%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 96%
Nuclear submarine

System: Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603ZM_GU603ZM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback