Asrock Z490 Taichi

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 126% UFO	Desktop 96% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 136% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 103%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	126% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Motherboard	Asrock Z490 Taichi (all builds)
Memory	24 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20200616
Uptime	9 Days
Run Date	Apr 23 '23 at 13:12
Run Duration	292 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	2%

Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-10900K-$410 107,269 User benchmarks, average bench 100% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.75 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	103% Outstanding	Memory 93.3 1-Core 152 2-Core 303 100% 183 Pts	4-Core 608 8-Core 1,189 106% 898 Pts	64-Core 1957 121% 1957 Pts
Poor: 89% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 106%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$500 619,642 User benchmarks, average bench 148% Asus(1043 87B8) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 531.61 Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (170 fps cap detected)	126% Outstanding	Lighting 170 Reflection 170 Parallax 170 138% 170 fps	MRender 170 Gravity 150 Splatting 133 122% 151 fps
Poor: 135% ↑ This bench: 126% Great: 158%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$86 455,997 User benchmarks, average bench 310% 9GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 2,593 Write 2,255 Mixed 1,833 495% 2,227 MB/s	4K Read 61.1 4K Write 134 4K Mixed 84.3 272% 93.3 MB/s	DQ Read 1,172 DQ Write 746 DQ Mixed 972 721% 964 MB/s
Poor: 188% Great: 410%
Samsung 870 QVO 1TB-$112 80,665 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 118GB free Firmware: SVQ01B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 512 Write 480 Mixed 441 106% 477 MB/s	4K Read 37.6 4K Write 94.2 4K Mixed 51.9 173% 61.2 MB/s	DQ Read 382 DQ Write 339 DQ Mixed 356 268% 359 MB/s
Poor: 48% Great: 128%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 22GB free Firmware: RVT02B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 509 Write 481 Mixed 457 108% 482 MB/s	4K Read 41.2 4K Write 94 4K Mixed 52.3 179% 62.5 MB/s	DQ Read 380 DQ Write 340 DQ Mixed 354 267% 358 MB/s
Poor: 74% Great: 129%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$45 695,066 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 71GB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 149 147 159 151 135 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	74.1% Very good	Read 112 Write 140 Mixed 74 SusWrite 146 87% 118 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.1 72% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 74.1% Great: 106%
Seagate Expansion SW 4TB 384 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 3TB free Firmware: 0001 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 101 Write 119 Mixed 69.1 72% 96.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 3.5 4K Mixed 0.7 168% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 19% Great: 91%
Intenso USB 3.0 Device 320GB 44 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 69GB free, PID 55aa Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 94 94 95 94 94 MB/s Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	33.7% Below average	Read 63.6 Write 70.7 Mixed 25.1 SusWrite 93.6 87% 63.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.7 70% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 33.7% Great: 40%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB 14,232 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 109GB free, PID a202 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 68.3 Write 79.3 Mixed 31 74% 59.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.5 73% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 14% Great: 49%
Seagate Expansion+ 1TB 195 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 22GB free, PID 2323 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 48.2 Write 84.8 Mixed 49 82% 60.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 4.9 4K Mixed 0.5 186% 2 MB/s
Poor: 10% Great: 51%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMWX16GC3200C16W4 2x16GB 1,200 User benchmarks, average bench 93% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (16^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	72.1% Very good	MC Read 25.3 MC Write 28 MC Mixed 21.7 71% 25 GB/s	SC Read 16.3 SC Write 29.2 SC Mixed 22.8 65% 22.8 GB/s	Latency 61.5 65% 61.5 ns
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 72.1% Great: 114%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z490 Taichi Builds (Compare 558 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 205%

UFO

Desktop 103%

UFO

Workstation 219%

UFO

Motherboard: Asrock Z490 Taichi

CPU
Core i9-10900KIntel $410Bench 100%, 107,269 samples	186x
Core i9-10850KIntel $279Bench 99%, 84,873 samples	103x
Core i7-10700KIntel $224Bench 97%, 198,859 samples	101x

GPU
RTX 3090Nvidia $1,198Bench 210%, 158,856 samples	101x
RTX 3080Nvidia $899Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	75x
RTX 3070Nvidia $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	52x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $86Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	68x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TBSamsung $150Bench 336%, 200,600 samples	35x
WDS100T3XHC-00SJG0 1TBBench 276%, 15,624 samples	28x

RAM
TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 4x16GBUnknownBench 90%, 3,173 samples	29x
TEAMGROUP-UD4-4000 4x8GBUnknownBench 102%, 1,219 samples	17x
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBKingstonBench 90%, 54,651 samples	13x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 57% - Above average

Total price: $1,695

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16