Biostar H81MHV3L

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics16% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive67.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardBiostar H81MHV3L  (all builds)
Memory1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141216
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 23 '23 at 11:07
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4590S-$79
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
66.3% Good
Memory 83.6
1-Core 94.5
2-Core 184
70% 121 Pts
4-Core 280
8-Core 315
39% 298 Pts
64-Core 312
19% 312 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 66.3%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 550-$79
Sapphire(1DA2 E367) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1285 MHz, MLim: 1800 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 23.4.1
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
16% Very poor
Lighting 17.2
Reflection 28.6
Parallax 23.7
14% 23.2 fps
MRender 26.8
Gravity 18.1
Splatting 27.2
20% 24 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 16%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
YS SSD 128GB
78GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HCS1A25E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 285 249 319 295 347 350 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
67.8% Good
Read 381
Write 348
Mixed 282
SusWrite 307
74% 329 MB/s
4K Read 33.5
4K Write 72.8
4K Mixed 14.1
107% 40.1 MB/s
DQ Read 35
DQ Write 104
DQ Mixed 15.8
28% 51.4 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 67.8%
Great: 73%
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$65
284GB free
Firmware: 01.03E01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 99 98 98 42 54 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
51.4% Above average
Read 97.5
Write 95.2
Mixed 61.9
SusWrite 81.1
62% 83.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
168% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 58%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23
217GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 120 120 120 121 122 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
71% Very good
Read 127
Write 118
Mixed 63.8
SusWrite 120
79% 107 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
181% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 71%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99P5474-015.A00LF 0467 RMR1810EC58E8F1333 4GB
1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
50.3% Above average
MC Read 17.8
MC Write 18.1
MC Mixed 15.7
49% 17.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 18
SC Mixed 15.2
45% 15.8 GB/s
Latency 74.2
54% 74.2 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H81MHV3L Builds (Compare 15 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Biostar H81MHV3L

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $188
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $336
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback