ECS H610H7-M2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics69.6% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive74.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardECS H610H7-M2  (all builds)
Memory10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20221031
Uptime3.1 Days
Run DateApr 21 '23 at 13:29
Run Duration109 Seconds
Run User VNM-User
Background CPU 15%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-12100F-$85
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
89.1% Excellent
Memory 80.8
1-Core 172
2-Core 306
101% 186 Pts
4-Core 523
8-Core 822
83% 673 Pts
64-Core 826
51% 826 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 89.1%
Great: 99%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$195
Nvidia(10DE 13D3) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
69.6% Good
Lighting 87.4
Reflection 86.8
Parallax 80.3
71% 84.8 fps
MRender 106
Gravity 75.1
Splatting 69.2
66% 83.4 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 69.6%
Great: 76%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSTC-MMP120-25 120GB
61GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 295 101 80 81 81 80 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
74.7% Very good
Read 399
Write 351
Mixed 310
SusWrite 120
66% 295 MB/s
4K Read 28.6
4K Write 78.5
4K Mixed 33
127% 46.7 MB/s
DQ Read 259
DQ Write 306
DQ Mixed 189
168% 251 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 74.7%
Great: 81%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Apacer GD2.1827CH.008 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
105% Outstanding
MC Read 39
MC Write 38.7
MC Mixed 36.6
109% 38.1 GB/s
SC Read 24.5
SC Write 40.2
SC Mixed 29.5
90% 31.4 GB/s
Latency 79
51% 79 ns
Poor: 75%
This bench: 105%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H610H7-M2 Builds (Compare 19 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 63%
Destroyer

Motherboard: ECS H610H7-M2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $280
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback