HP 250 G7 Notebook PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 16%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 7.28%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics3.45% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive36.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP 250 G7 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 84A6
Memory5.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20221116
Uptime2.8 Days
Run DateApr 21 '23 at 09:26
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-7020U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
7.28% Terrible
Memory 7.48
1-Core 31.2
2-Core 54.9
16% 31.2 Pts
4-Core 37.9
8-Core 80
7% 59 Pts
64-Core 43.1
3% 43.1 Pts
Poor: 16%
This bench: 7.28%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
HP(103C 84A6) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
3.45% Terrible
Lighting 5.1
Reflection 2.7
Parallax 5.8
4% 4.53 fps
MRender 4.5
Gravity 4
Splatting 0.2
2% 2.9 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.45%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CTNVME128S6 128GB
76GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V0429A Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 67 113 118 119 111 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
36.5% Below average
Read 404
Write 137
Mixed 113
SusWrite 105
42% 190 MB/s
4K Read 8.3
4K Write 26.2
4K Mixed 4
32% 12.8 MB/s
DQ Read 137
DQ Write 87.6
DQ Mixed 78.7
68% 101 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 36.5%
Great: 98%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
805GB free
Firmware: 04.01A04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 64 77 76 75 74 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
40.6% Average
Read 67.7
Write 75.1
Mixed 41.2
SusWrite 72.9
47% 64.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 3.6
4K Mixed 0.6
158% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 40.6%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF51264HZ-3G2J1 Crucial CB8GS2666.C8RT 12GB
2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
19.5% Very poor
MC Read 3.8
MC Write 11.4
MC Mixed 6.9
21% 7.37 GB/s
SC Read 4.5
SC Write 6
SC Mixed 3.6
13% 4.7 GB/s
Latency 428
9% 428 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 19.5%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 250 G7 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 2,865 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP 250 G7 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $35SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback