bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory3.95GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3.95GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardMicrosoft Virtual Machine
Memory0.7 GB free of 3.95117 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 3840 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220509
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateApr 21 '23 at 08:44
Run Duration264 Seconds
Run User IRL-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon Platinum 8272CL
None, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 4.3
2-Core 23.6
5% 14 Pts
4-Core 51.4
8-Core 63.7
7% 57.6 Pts
64-Core 37
2% 37 Pts
Poor: 26% Great: 70%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Microsoft Virtual Disk 69GB
30GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 86 87 84 89 67 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
45.8% Average
Read 73.2
Write 87.3
Mixed 121
SusWrite 84.8
69% 91.5 MB/s
4K Read 5.6
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 1.3
385% 2.43 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 45.8%
Great: 89%
Microsoft Virtual Disk 17GB
14GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 110 111 107 107 129 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
49.3% Average
Read 61.9
Write 27.7
Mixed 112
SusWrite 108
59% 77.5 MB/s
4K Read 3.6
4K Write 3.4
4K Mixed 0.5
268% 2.5 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 49.3%
Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Microsoft Corporation None Corporation None Corporation None 61GB
0, 0, 0 MHz
59392, 948, 3072 MB
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
3.99% Terrible
MC Read 0.5
MC Write 3.3
MC Mixed 1.2
5% 1.67 GB/s
SC Read 0.3
SC Write 0.3
SC Mixed 0.3
1% 0.3 GB/s
Latency 3,281
1% 3,281 ns
Poor: 4%
This bench: 3.99%
Great: 40%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,430 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback