Apple MacBookPro9,1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics6.66% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive55.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemApple MacBookPro9,1  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-4B7AC7E43945597E
Memory6.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.9 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1440 x 900 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170808
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 02 '17 at 17:47
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3615QM
U2E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
73.6% Very good
Memory 90.1
1-Core 89.8
2-Core 166
69% 115 Pts
4-Core 316
8-Core 407
46% 362 Pts
64-Core 406
25% 406 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 73.6%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 650M
Apple(106B 00FC) 512MB
CLim: 774 MHz, MLim: 1000 MHz, Ram: 512MB, Driver: 388.43
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
6.66% Terrible
Lighting 7.43
Reflection 6.85
Parallax 8.66
6% 7.65 fps
MRender 9.9
Gravity 8.9
Splatting 9.78
8% 9.53 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.66%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 250GB-$251
90GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXT06B0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
55.2% Above average
Read 495
Write 220
Mixed 165
64% 294 MB/s
4K Read 13.9
4K Write 19.4
4K Mixed 10.2
44% 14.5 MB/s
DQ Read 229
DQ Write 163
DQ Mixed 29.5
67% 141 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 55.2%
Great: 85%
Apple HDD TOSHIBA MK5065GSXF 500GB
256GB free
Firmware: GV201B Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
38.3% Below average
Read 67.7
Write 65.7
Mixed 68.8
51% 67.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.41
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.35
84% 0.75 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 38.3%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
37% Below average
MC Read 12.5
MC Write 11.5
MC Mixed 10.9
33% 11.6 GB/s
SC Read 12.8
SC Write 13.8
SC Mixed 13.2
38% 13.3 GB/s
Latency 67
60% 67 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 37%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MacBookPro9,1 Builds (Compare 155 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Apple MacBookPro9,1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 27% - Poor Total price: $85
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback