Positivo POS-MIH61CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics4.57% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemPositivo POS-MIH61CF  (all builds)
MotherboardPositivo POS-MIH61CF
Memory2.4 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121026
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 21 '23 at 02:32
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
76.1% Very good
Memory 91.6
1-Core 96.5
2-Core 192
74% 127 Pts
4-Core 328
8-Core 471
50% 400 Pts
64-Core 484
30% 484 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 76.1%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
Nvidia(10DE 118B) 2GB
CLim: 1282 MHz, MLim: 505 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
4.57% Terrible
Lighting 5.5
Reflection 5.5
Parallax 5.7
4% 5.57 fps
MRender 5.1
Gravity 5.2
Splatting 6.7
5% 5.67 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.57%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung HD322HJ 320GB-$44
17GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1AC01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 59 45 61 62 64 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
32% Below average
Read 56.4
Write 63.3
Mixed 46
SusWrite 54.5
41% 55 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
175% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 32%
Great: 62%
Seagate ST320LM001 HN-M320MBB 320GB
204GB free
Firmware: 2AR10002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 65 60 63 64 67 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
46.6% Average
Read 99.8
Write 20.2
Mixed 39.2
SusWrite 62.9
41% 55.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.5
83% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 46.6%
Great: 51%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
[Empty] 6GB
1600, 1600 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
51% Above average
MC Read 19
MC Write 17.5
MC Mixed 15.1
49% 17.2 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 16.8
SC Mixed 15.4
45% 15.9 GB/s
Latency 64.8
62% 64.8 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 51%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical POS-MIH61CF Builds (Compare 61 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Positivo POS-MIH61CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 12% - Very poor Total price: $26
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback