Acer Aspire A315-59G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics31.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive155% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAcer Aspire A315-59G  (all builds)
MotherboardADL Callisto_ADU
Memory3.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220816
Uptime1 Days
Run DateApr 21 '23 at 00:25
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1235U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 1.3 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
78.6% Very good
Memory 68.5
1-Core 160
2-Core 270
90% 166 Pts
4-Core 476
8-Core 736
75% 606 Pts
64-Core 439
27% 439 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 78.6%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce MX550
Acer(1025 161D) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.3168
Performing below potential (69th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
31.2% Below average
Lighting 39.6
Reflection 59.5
Parallax 42.4
32% 47.2 fps
MRender 31.4
Gravity 41
Splatting 34.4
29% 35.6 fps
Poor: 20%
This bench: 31.2%
Great: 35%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme SAMSUNG MZVLQ512HBLU-00B00 512GB
369GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXM7301Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1514 1667 1147 270 388 371 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
155% Outstanding
Read 895
Write 926
Mixed 934
SusWrite 893
206% 912 MB/s
4K Read 28.3
4K Write 70.7
4K Mixed 33.9
124% 44.3 MB/s
DQ Read 694
DQ Write 496
DQ Mixed 568
432% 586 MB/s
Poor: 111%
This bench: 155%
Great: 253%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43EB1-CWE 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
55% Above average
MC Read 20.8
MC Write 19.6
MC Mixed 18.8
56% 19.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.6
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 16.8
46% 16.2 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 55%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire A315-59G Builds (Compare 100 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire A315-59G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $547Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback