Performance Results


Gaming 109% UFO	Desktop 92% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 102% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	127% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	237% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8700-$186 349,567 User benchmarks, average bench 87% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	85.4% Excellent	Memory 84.8 1-Core 127 2-Core 255 86% 155 Pts	4-Core 463 8-Core 775 75% 619 Pts	64-Core 1,047 65% 1,047 Pts
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 85.4% Great: 94%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340 442,467 User benchmarks, average bench 128% Asus(1043 8850) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3600 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 531.68 Performing below potential (45^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	127% Outstanding	Lighting 177 Reflection 221 Parallax 159 144% 186 fps	MRender 181 Gravity 133 Splatting 114 114% 143 fps
Poor: 116% ↑ This bench: 127% Great: 136%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69 367,854 User benchmarks, average bench 276% 370GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1915 992 792 794 793 800 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	237% Outstanding	Read 2,338 Write 2,173 Mixed 1,734 SusWrite 1,014 406% 1,815 MB/s	4K Read 50.1 4K Write 89.2 4K Mixed 64.3 206% 67.9 MB/s	DQ Read 355 DQ Write 435 DQ Mixed 584 388% 458 MB/s
Poor: 178% ↑ This bench: 237% Great: 355%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 164GB free Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 455 370 363 343 367 346 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	108% Outstanding	Read 480 Write 420 Mixed 435 SusWrite 374 96% 427 MB/s	4K Read 37.2 4K Write 84.4 4K Mixed 48.3 163% 56.6 MB/s	DQ Read 356 DQ Write 344 DQ Mixed 361 268% 354 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 108% Great: 129%
Seagate Backup+ Desk 4TB 108 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 490GB free Firmware: 0342 SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 97 90 102 104 110 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	12.2% Very poor	Read 105 Write 44.4 Mixed 84.2 SusWrite 97.8 18% 82.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 9.4 4K Mixed 0.7 7% 3.57 MB/s	DQ Read 1 DQ Write 5.5 DQ Mixed 1.1 2% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 12.2% Great: 17%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4-3200C16-8GTZR F4-3200C16-8GSXWB F4-3200C16-8GTZR F4-3200C16-8GSXWB 32GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Performing below potential (17^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	70.7% Very good	MC Read 25.8 MC Write 27.6 MC Mixed 21.8 72% 25.1 GB/s	SC Read 14.4 SC Write 28.7 SC Mixed 20.4 60% 21.2 GB/s	Latency 72.2 55% 72.2 ns
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 70.7% Great: 95%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 94%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 91%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 86%

Aircraft carrier

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	161x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $140Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	158x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $69Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	121x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	151x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	101x
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	84x

Value: 102% - Outstanding

Total price: $632

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16