Asus PRIME Z370-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 177%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 177%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics187% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive237% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
13 months ago, 13 months ago.
MotherboardAsus PRIME Z370-A  (all builds)
Memory21.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20180702
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateApr 20 '23 at 18:33
Run Duration267 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900K-$409
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
97.4% Outstanding
Memory 91.5
1-Core 142
2-Core 286
95% 173 Pts
4-Core 554
8-Core 983
93% 769 Pts
64-Core 1,510
93% 1,510 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 97.4%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,198
Nvidia(10DE 147D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4875 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 531.41
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
187% Outstanding
Lighting 272
Reflection 256
Parallax 282
222% 270 fps
MRender 307
Gravity 232
Splatting 163
184% 234 fps
Poor: 185%
This bench: 187%
Great: 230%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$160
848GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1154 1111 1105 1208 1217 1132 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
237% Outstanding
Read 1,396
Write 1253
Mixed 1,231
SusWrite 1,154
283% 1,259 MB/s
4K Read 59.1
4K Write 98
4K Mixed 70.7
232% 75.9 MB/s
DQ Read 940
DQ Write 810
DQ Mixed 899
667% 883 MB/s
Poor: 283%
This bench: 237%
Great: 526%
PNY SSD2SC240G5SA754D117-511 240GB
118GB free
Firmware: N0530A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 344 335 332 350 354 339 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
95.4% Outstanding
Read 468
Write 340
Mixed 309
SusWrite 342
82% 365 MB/s
4K Read 28
4K Write 79.8
4K Mixed 40.4
136% 49.4 MB/s
DQ Read 289
DQ Write 307
DQ Mixed 204
179% 267 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 95.4%
Great: 106%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
40GB free
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 401 320 321 315 194 181 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 488
Write 479
Mixed 410
SusWrite 289
94% 416 MB/s
4K Read 36.3
4K Write 88.3
4K Mixed 50.5
166% 58.4 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 337
DQ Mixed 358
269% 359 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 105%
Great: 129%
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
112GB free
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 334 129 129 129 129 129 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
94% Outstanding
Read 455
Write 459
Mixed 349
SusWrite 163
80% 356 MB/s
4K Read 37.1
4K Write 87.3
4K Mixed 45.6
161% 56.7 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 179
184% 301 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 94%
Great: 108%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
931GB free
Firmware: CC4B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 194 199 199 183 197 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 181
Write 128
Mixed 69.5
SusWrite 189
103% 142 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
169% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 106%
Great: 112%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$39
930GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 175 177 178 177 175 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 191
Write 166
Mixed 94.9
SusWrite 176
115% 157 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.3
249% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 105%
Great: 108%
Seagate Desktop 8TB
6TB free
Firmware: 040B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 40 40 41 41 39 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
26.3% Poor
Read 50.2
Write 36.8
Mixed 35.8
SusWrite 40
30% 40.7 MB/s
4K Read 2.4
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.8
237% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 26.3%
Great: 93%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 CMK16GX4M2A2666C16 CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 CMK16GX4M2A2666C16 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
68.1% Good
MC Read 23.6
MC Write 27.1
MC Mixed 21.6
69% 24.1 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 24.4
SC Mixed 19.8
55% 19.4 GB/s
Latency 65
62% 65 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 68.1%
Great: 101%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME Z370-A Builds (Compare 11,301 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 110%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 100%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME Z370-A - $132

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $940
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback