Machenike F117-B

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics5.75% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive131% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
13 months ago, 13 months ago.
SystemMachenike F117-B  (all builds)
MotherboardMACHENIKE F117-B
Memory7 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit 种颜色, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 种颜色
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20180429
Uptime8.8 Days
Run DateApr 20 '23 at 15:23
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
77.5% Very good
Memory 91.8
1-Core 107
2-Core 197
77% 132 Pts
4-Core 342
8-Core 496
52% 419 Pts
64-Core 586
36% 586 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 77.5%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Device(1D05 1044) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2112
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
5.75% Terrible
Lighting 6.3
Reflection 40
Parallax 7.3
5% 17.9 fps
MRender 9
Gravity 6.2
Splatting 9.8
7% 8.33 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.75%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteon CA3-8D256 256GB
182GB free (System drive)
Firmware: C482101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 252 255 256 260 263 261 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
131% Outstanding
Read 1,445
Write 268
Mixed 375
SusWrite 258
127% 586 MB/s
4K Read 31.6
4K Write 69.5
4K Mixed 41
137% 47.4 MB/s
DQ Read 414
DQ Write 265
DQ Mixed 284
227% 321 MB/s
Poor: 85%
This bench: 131%
Great: 209%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB
363GB free
Firmware: 100002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 121 119 120 122 120 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
72.1% Very good
Read 131
Write 129
Mixed 53.8
SusWrite 120
79% 109 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.6
160% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 72.1%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KKN2NM-MIE Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 12GB
2667, 2667 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
57.9% Above average
MC Read 22.4
MC Write 21.3
MC Mixed 15.3
56% 19.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 23.4
SC Mixed 18.4
54% 18.7 GB/s
Latency 64.4
62% 64.4 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 57.9%
Great: 64%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical F117-B Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Machenike F117-B

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback