Gigabyte GA-B760M GAMING X AX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 368%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 121%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 398%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 124%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics311% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive543% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B760M GAMING X AX  (all builds)
Memory23 GB free of 32 GB
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230322
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 20 '23 at 14:40
Run Duration182 Seconds
Run User SGP-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-13600KF-$235
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.85 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
124% Outstanding
Memory 88.1
1-Core 212
2-Core 426
126% 242 Pts
4-Core 852
8-Core 1,420
138% 1,136 Pts
64-Core 2,450
152% 2,450 Pts
Poor: 117%
This bench: 124%
Great: 127%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4080-$970
Zotac(19DA 2688) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 5600 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 531.68
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
311% Outstanding
Lighting 469
Reflection 455
Parallax 482
382% 468 fps
MRender 577
Gravity 389
Splatting 280
324% 416 fps
Poor: 263%
This bench: 311%
Great: 305%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Lexar NM710 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 8212
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3689 3772 3677 2270 2332 2368 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
543% Outstanding
Read 4,005
Write 4,164
Mixed 2,768
SusWrite 3,018
784% 3,489 MB/s
4K Read 72.8
4K Write 284
4K Mixed 112
405% 156 MB/s
DQ Read 2,073
DQ Write 1,230
DQ Mixed 1,375
1,098% 1,559 MB/s
Poor: 284%
This bench: 543%
Great: 600%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 144 144 147 138 141 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
58.5% Above average
Read 62.1
Write 114
Mixed 69.8
SusWrite 142
71% 96.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
80% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 58.5%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AX5U6000C4016G-DCLAR 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 6000 MHz
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
190% Outstanding
MC Read 80.9
MC Write 74
MC Mixed 70.1
214% 75 GB/s
SC Read 21.1
SC Write 51
SC Mixed 31.8
99% 34.6 GB/s
Latency 69.4
58% 69.4 ns
Poor: 135%
This bench: 190%
Great: 197%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B760M GAMING X AX Builds (Compare 142 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 282%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 119%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 306%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B760M GAMING X AX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $1,008
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback