MSI B560M-A PRO (MS-7D20)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Boot Drive126% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7D20
MotherboardMSI B560M-A PRO (MS-7D20)  (all builds)
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221009
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 20 '23 at 13:06
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User IRQ-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10600KF-$118
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
96.1% Outstanding
Memory 96.7
1-Core 138
2-Core 276
95% 170 Pts
4-Core 514
8-Core 873
84% 693 Pts
64-Core 1,114
69% 1,114 Pts
Poor: 81%
This bench: 96.1%
Great: 100%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kinghico NVME 256GB
57GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0928A0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 586 122 103 68 86 58 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
126% Outstanding
Read 1,605
Write 792
Mixed 806
SusWrite 171
186% 843 MB/s
4K Read 37.7
4K Write 121
4K Mixed 23.4
151% 60.6 MB/s
DQ Read 43.5
DQ Write 278
DQ Mixed 25.9
60% 116 MB/s
Poor: 126%
This bench: 126%
Great: 156%
Seagate Momentus Thin 5400.9 2.5" 500GB-$21
137GB free
Firmware: 0001SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 29 29 31 31 33 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
26.8% Poor
Read 62.8
Write 26.7
Mixed 18
SusWrite 30.6
25% 34.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.4
86% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 26.8%
Great: 61%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$39
174GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 127 128 128 128 127 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
68.1% Good
Read 110
Write 109
Mixed 80.7
SusWrite 127
79% 107 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.1
223% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 68.1%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Golden Empire CL16-16-16 D4-3200 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
92.6% Outstanding
MC Read 30.2
MC Write 39.6
MC Mixed 25.5
91% 31.8 GB/s
SC Read 20.7
SC Write 44.2
SC Mixed 31
91% 32 GB/s
Latency 51.6
78% 51.6 ns
Poor: 75%
This bench: 92.6%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B560M-A PRO (MS-7D20) Builds (Compare 3,784 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: MSI B560M-A PRO (MS-7D20)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $364
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback