Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 49% Yacht	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	15% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	38% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium G2030-$24 18,277 User benchmarks, average bench 49% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	39.1% Below average	Memory 67.5 1-Core 53.3 2-Core 38.9 39% 53.2 Pts	4-Core 64.7 8-Core 73.9 9% 69.3 Pts	64-Core 60.7 4% 60.7 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 39.1% Great: 58%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Intel HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz) 146,665 User benchmarks, average bench 1% ASRock(1849 0152) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252 Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	1.37% Terrible	Lighting 1.5 Reflection 1 Parallax 1.5 1% 1.33 fps	MRender 3.2 Gravity 1 Splatting 2 2% 2.07 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.37% Great: 2%
Nvidia GT 1030 185,384 User benchmarks, average bench 14% Asus(1043 86DC) 2GB CLim: 2088 MHz, MLim: 1592 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 531.68 Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	15% Very poor	Lighting 18.6 Reflection 19.3 Parallax 19.2 15% 19 fps	MRender 16.6 Gravity 20.3 Splatting 17.5 15% 18.1 fps
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 15% Great: 15%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Gigabyte SSD 120GB-$30 13,685 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 49GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM61.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 140 54 54 53 51 MB/s Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	38% Below average	Read 190 Write 178 Mixed 159 SusWrite 85.9 34% 153 MB/s	4K Read 18.6 4K Write 32.5 4K Mixed 13.2 62% 21.4 MB/s	DQ Read 160 DQ Write 137 DQ Mixed 116 96% 138 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 38% Great: 86%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25 163,843 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 80GB free Firmware: MS1OA750 SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 122 115 121 120 114 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	66% Good	Read 110 Write 117 Mixed 23.2 SusWrite 120 67% 92.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.7 138% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 66% Great: 103%
WD Purple 1TB (2014)-$60 18,782 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 125GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 76 85 80 78 70 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	33.7% Below average	Read 42.3 Write 50.5 Mixed 20.1 SusWrite 75.3 34% 47.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.3 49% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 33.7% Great: 85%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5474-028.A00LF 99U5471-012.A00LF 8GB 167 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	28.6% Poor	MC Read 9 MC Write 11.7 MC Mixed 10.5 30% 10.4 GB/s	SC Read 4.9 SC Write 5.8 SC Mixed 4.6 15% 5.1 GB/s	Latency 108 37% 108 ns
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 28.6% Great: 51%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 62%

Destroyer

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	29x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	21x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	16x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	17x
MX500 500GBCrucial $53Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	8x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $36Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	7x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	11x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 2x4GBKingstonBench 49%, 26,466 samples	9x
CT102464BA160B.C16 1x8GBCrucialBench 30%, 12,839 samples	6x

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $325

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16