HP Elite x360 830 13 inch G9 2-in-1 Notebook PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (11th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 89 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics9.72% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive100% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemHP Elite x360 830 13 inch G9 2-in-1 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 896E
Memory5.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit Farben, 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit Farben, 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221230
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 19 '23 at 12:21
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1265U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
42.9% Average
Memory 43.9
1-Core 73
2-Core 152
48% 89.8 Pts
4-Core 225
8-Core 373
36% 299 Pts
64-Core 446
28% 446 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 42.9%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
HP(103C 896E) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4032
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
9.72% Terrible
Lighting 10.9
Reflection 13.5
Parallax 14.1
9% 12.8 fps
MRender 13.6
Gravity 15.9
Splatting 12.5
11% 14 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 9.72%
Great: 18%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MTFDKBA512TFH-1BC1AABHA 512GB
422GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS0043
SusWrite @10s intervals: 354 316 425 408 405 488 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
100% Outstanding
Read 1,239
Write 448
Mixed 594
SusWrite 399
148% 670 MB/s
4K Read 24
4K Write 12.6
4K Mixed 16.4
64% 17.7 MB/s
DQ Read 242
DQ Write 66
DQ Mixed 90
83% 133 MB/s
Poor: 135%
This bench: 100%
Great: 403%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron MT60B1G16HC-48B:A 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
70% Good
MC Read 25.8
MC Write 30.7
MC Mixed 26.5
79% 27.7 GB/s
SC Read 8.2
SC Write 17.4
SC Mixed 12.7
36% 12.8 GB/s
Latency 185
22% 185 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 70%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Elite x360 830 13 inch G9 2-in-1 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 44 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

System: HP Elite x360 830 13 inch G9 2-in-1 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback