Emaxx EMX-IH310LTX-ICAFE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics3.89% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive85.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemEmaxx EMX-IH310LTX-ICAFE  (all builds)
MotherboardEMAXX EMX-IH310LTX-ICAFE
Memory19.9 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20180828
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 19 '23 at 07:25
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400-$160
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
82.5% Excellent
Memory 84.5
1-Core 116
2-Core 226
80% 142 Pts
4-Core 452
8-Core 529
64% 490 Pts
64-Core 508
32% 508 Pts
Poor: 78%
This bench: 82.5%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i5 i7)
Intel(8086 3E92) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2114
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
3.89% Terrible
Lighting 5.9
Reflection 7.9
Parallax 6.5
5% 6.77 fps
MRender 0.2
Gravity 8
Splatting 0.2
2% 2.8 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.89%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Colorful SL500 240GB
111GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 208 122 129 127 130 130 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
85.9% Excellent
Read 449
Write 284
Mixed 306
SusWrite 141
66% 295 MB/s
4K Read 34.1
4K Write 75.2
4K Mixed 44.3
148% 51.2 MB/s
DQ Read 346
DQ Write 244
DQ Mixed 103
129% 231 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 85.9%
Great: 97%
Samsung HD502HJ 500GB-$50
192GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 94 93 94 94 94 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
50.6% Above average
Read 81.6
Write 87.9
Mixed 62.1
SusWrite 94.1
60% 81.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1
194% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 50.6%
Great: 77%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT8G4DFS824A.C8FHD1 Kingston KHX2400C15/16G 24GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 16384 MB
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
62.4% Good
MC Read 22.6
MC Write 23.9
MC Mixed 20.4
64% 22.3 GB/s
SC Read 12.6
SC Write 20.1
SC Mixed 18
48% 16.9 GB/s
Latency 72.7
55% 72.7 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 62.4%
Great: 93%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EMX-IH310LTX-ICAFE Builds (Compare 13 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Emaxx EMX-IH310LTX-ICAFE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 101% - Outstanding Total price: $160
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback