Lenovo 20X30071US

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics15.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive107% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 20X30071US  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20X30071US
Memory9.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220228
Uptime1.7 Days
Run DateApr 19 '23 at 07:10
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User ZAF-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1135G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
50.1% Above average
Memory 25.6
1-Core 128
2-Core 243
65% 132 Pts
4-Core 399
8-Core 594
62% 497 Pts
64-Core 587
36% 587 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
Legend(17AA 508F) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1404
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
15.8% Very poor
Lighting 19.4
Reflection 20.2
Parallax 22.6
16% 20.7 fps
MRender 17.6
Gravity 26.4
Splatting 15.4
16% 19.8 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 15.8%
Great: 20%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial P2 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$55
326GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P2CR033 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 779 867 192 69 306 66 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 550
Write 639
Mixed 600
SusWrite 380
122% 542 MB/s
4K Read 32.5
4K Write 87.4
4K Mixed 43.1
151% 54.3 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 280
DQ Mixed 497
327% 388 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 107%
Great: 253%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4SFRA32A.M8FR Samsung M471A1G44AB0-CWE 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
42.3% Average
MC Read 15.1
MC Write 22
MC Mixed 11.8
47% 16.3 GB/s
SC Read 5.8
SC Write 15
SC Mixed 7.5
27% 9.43 GB/s
Latency 282
14% 282 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 42.3%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20X30071US Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20X30071US

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback