Asus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics48.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive32.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA  (all builds)
Memory21.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170607
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateApr 19 '23 at 06:17
Run Duration174 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 24%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8320E-$87
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
57.1% Above average
Memory 78.9
1-Core 55.8
2-Core 99.6
50% 78.1 Pts
4-Core 193
8-Core 315
31% 254 Pts
64-Core 306
19% 306 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 57.1%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
CLim: 1300 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.20.27.07
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
48.6% Average
Lighting 61.5
Reflection 59.9
Parallax 81.6
50% 67.7 fps
MRender 60.1
Gravity 67.4
Splatting 44.3
46% 57.3 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$30
32GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z320
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 42 38 29 39 41 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
32.3% Below average
Read 246
Write 33.6
Mixed 5
SusWrite 37
17% 80.3 MB/s
4K Read 16.2
4K Write 17
4K Mixed 13.6
51% 15.6 MB/s
DQ Read 161
DQ Write 45.1
DQ Mixed 0.1
27% 68.9 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 32.3%
Great: 86%
Hitachi HUA723030ALA 3TB
1TB free
Firmware: MKAO
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 83 82 84 84 85 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
46.3% Average
Read 77.9
Write 76.9
Mixed 53.9
SusWrite 83.1
54% 73 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
171% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 46.3%
Great: 85%
Hitachi HUA723030ALA 3TB
745GB free
Firmware: MKAO
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 83 82 84 84 85 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
60.8% Good
Read 128
Write 143
Mixed 82.2
SusWrite 83.1
80% 109 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
192% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 60.8%
Great: 85%
Hitachi HUA723030ALA641 802GB
1.5TB free
Firmware: MKAO
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 124 121 122 122 122 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
66.4% Good
Read 109
Write 108
Mixed 72.6
SusWrite 122
76% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
163% 1.27 MB/s
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$60
501GB free
Firmware: CC52
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 82 82 84 84 85 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
49.6% Average
Read 90
Write 70.6
Mixed 60.1
SusWrite 83.1
56% 76 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.6
106% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 49.6%
Great: 96%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 16G-D3-1600-MR YXS1866C10D3/8G 16G-D3-1600-MR YXS1866C10D3/8G 32GB
1066, 1066, 1066, 1066 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
38.9% Below average
MC Read 14.5
MC Write 14.1
MC Mixed 12.7
39% 13.8 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 7.7
SC Mixed 10.5
26% 9 GB/s
Latency 82.7
48% 82.7 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 38.9%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970 PRO GAMING/AURA Builds (Compare 902 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA - $299

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $588
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $289Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback