Asus TUF GAMING Z690-PLUS WIFI D4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 252%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 121%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 297%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 123%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics210% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive556% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
14 months ago, 14 months ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING Z690-PLUS WIFI D4  (all builds)
Memory57.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20221130
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateApr 18 '23 at 01:28
Run Duration326 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-12900KF-$266
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
123% Outstanding
Memory 91.8
1-Core 211
2-Core 413
125% 239 Pts
4-Core 826
8-Core 1,651
146% 1,239 Pts
64-Core 2,883
178% 2,883 Pts
Poor: 110%
This bench: 123%
Great: 124%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-Ti-$660
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4850 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 528.02
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
210% Outstanding
Lighting 310
Reflection 289
Parallax 319
252% 306 fps
MRender 356
Gravity 254
Splatting 188
209% 266 fps
Poor: 162%
This bench: 210%
Great: 225%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SFYRD2000G 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: EIFK31.6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4463 4853 2473 2631 2548 2804 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
556% Outstanding
Read 3,164
Write 4859
Mixed 3,426
SusWrite 3,295
836% 3,686 MB/s
4K Read 85.5
4K Write 333
4K Mixed 135
479% 185 MB/s
DQ Read 1,958
DQ Write 1,633
DQ Mixed 1,888
1,389% 1,826 MB/s
Poor: 274%
This bench: 556%
Great: 614%
HP S700 500GB-$60
464GB free
Firmware: R0522A1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 466 456 458 457 457 459 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 495
Write 453
Mixed 424
SusWrite 459
103% 458 MB/s
4K Read 31.7
4K Write 127
4K Mixed 32.3
156% 63.6 MB/s
DQ Read 258
DQ Write 309
DQ Mixed 48
102% 205 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 107%
Great: 100%
WD Blue SN570 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: 234100WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1512 586 574 586 574 578 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
303% Outstanding
Read 2,072
Write 2,325
Mixed 1,950
SusWrite 735
398% 1,770 MB/s
4K Read 59.3
4K Write 195
4K Mixed 85.5
303% 113 MB/s
DQ Read 1,784
DQ Write 1,904
DQ Mixed 1,512
1,229% 1,733 MB/s
Poor: 159%
This bench: 303%
Great: 300%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$137
922GB free
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 490 491 491 491 491 491 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
132% Outstanding
Read 512
Write 486
Mixed 466
SusWrite 490
110% 488 MB/s
4K Read 43.1
4K Write 128
4K Mixed 62.4
213% 77.9 MB/s
DQ Read 374
DQ Write 320
DQ Mixed 342
258% 345 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 132%
Great: 133%
Hitachi HUH721008ALN600 8TB
6.5TB free
Firmware: LHGNT384
SusWrite @10s intervals: 205 218 225 209 216 202 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 191
Write 197
Mixed 96.8
SusWrite 212
127% 174 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 5.4
4K Mixed 1.3
299% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 116%
Great: 130%
WD My Passport 260D 5TB
2.5TB free, PID 260d
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 43 43 43 43 43 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
22.2% Poor
Read 53.1
Write 38.6
Mixed 32
SusWrite 42.8
54% 41.6 MB/s
4K Read 2.2
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 1
93% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 22.2%
Great: 65%
WD Elements 25A3 12TB
3.5TB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 142 142 140 138 138 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
68.9% Good
Read 130
Write 142
Mixed 95.9
SusWrite 140
174% 127 MB/s
4K Read 2.8
4K Write 6.1
4K Mixed 1.3
262% 3.4 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 68.9%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl F4-3600C16-16GVKC 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
120% Outstanding
MC Read 42.1
MC Write 45.3
MC Mixed 41.4
123% 42.9 GB/s
SC Read 30.6
SC Write 48.8
SC Mixed 38.1
112% 39.2 GB/s
Latency 64.5
62% 64.5 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 120%
Great: 135%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING Z690-PLUS WIFI D4 Builds (Compare 15,851 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 209%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 115%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 230%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING Z690-PLUS WIFI D4 - $181

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $1,057
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback