ADD TO PC
BUILD

Crystal X8DTL

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 48% Yacht	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	0.54% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	48.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 16GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

8 years ago, 8 years ago.

System	Crystal X8DTL (all builds)
Motherboard	Supermicro X8DTL
Memory	14 GB free of 16.0039 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20110827
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 28 '15 at 17:20
Run Duration	309 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5504 489 User benchmarks, average bench 52% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2 GHz Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	55.9% Above average	Memory 77.4 1-Core 48.2 2-Core 101 48% 75.4 Pts	4-Core 201 8-Core 201 27% 201 Pts	64-Core 199 12% 199 Pts
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 55.9% Great: 58%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro NVS 295 975 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Nvidia(10DE 062F) 256MB Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 9.18.13.1135 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	0.54% Terrible	Lighting 0.6 Reflection 1.31 Parallax 0.28 0% 0.73 fps	MRender 0.9 Gravity 0.43 Splatting 0.96 1% 0.76 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.54% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
LSI MegaSR 127GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 76GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.0 Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	48.5% Average	Read 519 Write 180 Mixed 253 69% 317 MB/s	4K Read 15.5 4K Write 15.7 4K Mixed 4.92 38% 12 MB/s	DQ Read 208 DQ Write 57.6 DQ Mixed 14.2 41% 93.4 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 48.5% Great: 60%
PNY USB 2.0 FD 16GB 181 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 15GB free, PID fa05 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	3.98% Terrible	Read 16.3 Write 4.56 Mixed 5.39 9% 8.76 MB/s	4K Read 2.46 4K Write 0.01 4K Mixed 0.007 10% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 3.98% Great: 10%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9965525-026.A00LF 9965525-026.A00LF ATMEL 26DF321 52GB 800, 800, 33 MHz 8192, 8192, 36864 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	29.6% Poor	MC Read 10.8 MC Write 9.1 MC Mixed 9.6 28% 9.83 GB/s	SC Read 8 SC Write 8.7 SC Mixed 7.8 23% 8.17 GB/s	Latency 85.5 47% 85.5 ns

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.

Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?

PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.

Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?

Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...

Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?

Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback